Tuesday, April 22, 2008

JOHN WALSH, ADMITTED TO WOMEN SEX ADDICTION CNN LIVE, LUNSFORD WATCHES PORN ON NET! SHOULD WE ALLOW ANYONE THAT DOES THIS TO BE AROUND OUR CHILDREN?

THIS SITE HAS BEEN CREATED FOR HUMAN RIGHTS FOR ALL! WE HAVE TRIED TO STATE THE FACTS AS THEY ARE, IF ANYONE FINDS ANY REPORT WRONG ON HERE PLEASE EMAIL US!
SEE WHAT THE EXPERTS SAY!
SEE WHAT THE EXPERTS HAVE TO SAY ABOUT A PERSON ADMITTING TO AN ADDICTION FOR WOMEN. AND WE ALLOW THIS MAN AROUND CHILDREN??????


WILL YOUR 4, 5 OR 6 YEAR OLD BE NEXT ON JOHN WALSH''S LIST TO GET HIS REVENGE FOR THE LOST OF HIS SON?

http://sexoffenderissues.blogspot.com/2008/04/its-come-to-this-calling-police-on.html

JOHN WALSH ADMITS HE HAD SEX ADDICTION FOR WOMEN FOR A LONG TIME,ON LARRY KING LIVE. HOWEVER HE DID NOT ADMIT WITH WHOM AND THEIR AGE??? ONE HAS TO ASK THE QUESTION DO WE TRUST ANYONE THAT ADMITS TO A SEX ADDICTION, OR ANYONE THAT WATCHES ADULT PORN SUCH AS MARK LUNSFORD SAID HE DOES ON THE NET, BE ALLOWED AROUND OUR CHILDREN! ACCORDING TO JOHN WELL HE SAY'S NEVER HIRE A MALE BABY SITTER THAT BEGS ANOTHER QUESTION? SOMEWHERE LURCKING IN THE DARK IS A HIDDEN SECRET.


SEE WHAT THE EXPERTS HAVE TO SAY ABOUT A PERSON ADMITTING TO AN ADDICTION FOR WOMEN. AND WE ALLOW THIS MAN AROUND CHILDREN??????

http://www.medicinenet.com/sexual_addiction/article.htm

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sexual_addiction

JOHN WALSH SELLING MORE TONIC WATER WITHOUT U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE REPORT AND STUDY. HE WILL LEAD THEM AS HE HAS ALWAYS WITHOUT PROPER DATA. SO GIVEN THE FACT THAT WALSH ADMITTED TO HAVING A SEX ADDITION FOR WOMEN FOR A LONG TIME? WE THINK HE SHOULD BE DEMANDED TO GIVE A "DNA" NOW AT ONCE SO WE CAN TRACK HIM. DO WE REALLY KNOW IF HE STILL HAS HIS ADDICTION OR NOT? MAYBE HE DOES MAYBE HE DOES NOT? ARE WE WILLING TO TAKE THAT CHANCE WITH OUR CHILDREN OR YOUNG TEENS? WHY DID THEY POST THIS YOUNG PHOTO OF HIM? SO PEOPLE ARE CONFUSED? WE NEED HIS DNA!!!!! SO MAYBE WE CAN GO BACK AND FIND SOME OF THE WOMEN THAT HE SAYS HE HAD ADDICTION FOR.


WE NEED YOUR DNA WALSH, AS WELL AS MARK FOLEY AND ALL!

http://www.amw.com/safety/?p=536

http://sexoffenderissues.blogspot.com/2008/03/dc-john-walsh-its-time-for-national-dna.html

LOOK AT THIS FROM CNN AND OTHERS HOW CAN THIS MAN LIE SO MUCH, WHEN ONE LIES, JOHN THEY HAVE TO TELL MORE TO COVERUP ANOTHER LIE? HE SAYS IN ONE INTERVIEW HE LOST HIS HOME, LIGHTS TURNED OFF, LOST 30 POUNDS, AND AT THE SAME TIME HE SAYS THIS? SO A MAN THAT IS A " PARTNER IN BUILDING A $ 26 MILLION DOLLAR HOTEL IN BAHAMAS HAD HIS LIGHTS TURNED OFF??

My partners sustained me, kept me going, paid my bills. SO WHICH IS JOHN ANOTHER LIE???? OVER AND OVER YOU TELL LIE AFTER LIE AND SOMEONE IS GOING TO CATCH YOU IN THE END!!!!!!!

I loved the hotel business. It was my passion. I was a partner with three other guys. We were building a $26-million dream project hotel in the Bahamas. I was very successful. I was living the American dream. That dream turned into a nightmare one day when I went to work and never saw my son again. I lost 30 pounds. I couldn’t function. The hotel business was irrelevant. The opening of that dream project was irrelevant. My partners sustained me, kept me going, paid my bills.

http://www.floridatrend.com/article.asp?aID=58028122.416801.627965.7788751.80312402.511&aID2=48296

KING: When -- it has to be asked. How did you go on after the loss of our boy? WALSH: I almost didn't. You know, I mean, I was building a $26 million hotel in the Bahamas, which meant nothing to me after Adam was murdered. I lost my company, I lost 30 pounds. My house went into foreclosure. And...

http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/0203/04/lkl.00.html Larry King Live CNN

http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/0203/04/lkl.00.html Larry King SEE THE LIES WITH NOTHING TO BACK UP WHAT HE SAYS ON LARRY KING.......



JOHN WALSH LOBBIES TO PUT MORE CHILDREN IN JAIL AS YOUNG AS 4 YEARS OLD, HE MUST HATE CHILDREN? OR IS HE TRYING TO PUNISHED ALL FAMILIES FOR HIS WIFES MISTAKE LEAVING POOR ADAM ALONE IN THE SEARS STORE.


http://sexoffenderissues.blogspot.com/2007/12/child-sex-offenders.html








WHY HAS HE NOT CALLED FOR FOLEYS DNA??? AS WELL AS

OTHER LAWMAKERS??? WHAT ARE THEY ALL HIDING?


WALSH AND HIS BUDDY FOLEY! ONE WITH SEX ADDICTION FOR WOMEN AND ONE CAUGHT AFTER YOUNG MALES ON THE INTERNET! NICE PAIR GUYS!















MARK FOLEY WHO JOHN WALSH HELP WRITE THE LAW AND SOME OF HIS IM'S TO THE PAGE A CHILD! TO THINK THIS MAN WROTE A LAW ADAM WALSH LAW.


Maf54 (7:43:54 PM): nice
Maf54 (7:43:54 PM): youll be way hot then
Xxxxxxxxx (7:44:01 PM): haha...hopefully
Maf54 (7:44:22 PM): better be
Maf54 (7:46:01 PM): well I better let you go do oyur thing
Xxxxxxxxx (7:46:07 PM): oh ok
Xxxxxxxxx (7:46:11 PM): have fun campaigning
Xxxxxxxxx (7:46:17 PM): or however you spell it
Xxxxxxxxx (7:46:18 PM): lol
Xxxxxxxxx (7:46:25 PM): ill see ya in a couple of weeks
Maf54 (7:46:33 PM): did any girl give you a haand job this weekend
Xxxxxxxxx (7:46:38 PM): lol no
Xxxxxxxxx (7:46:40 PM): im single right now
Xxxxxxxxx (7:46:57 PM): my last gf and i broke up a few weeks agi
Maf54 (7:47:11 PM): are you
Maf54 (7:47:11 PM): good so your getting horny
Xxxxxxxxx (7:47:29 PM): lol...a bit
Maf54 (7:48:00 PM): did you spank it this weekend yourself
Xxxxxxxxx (7:48:04 PM): no
Xxxxxxxxx (7:48:16 PM): been too tired and too busy
Maf54 (7:48:33 PM): wow...
Maf54 (7:48:34 PM): i am never to busy haha
Xxxxxxxxx (7:48:51 PM): haha
Maf54 (7:50:02 PM): or tired..helps me sleep
Xxxxxxxxx (7:50:15 PM): thats true
Xxxxxxxxx (7:50:36 PM): havent been having a problem with sleep though.. i just walk in the door and collapse well at least this weekend
Maf54 (7:50:56 PM): i am sure
Xxxxxxxxx (7:50:57 PM): i dont do it very often normally though
Maf54 (7:51:11 PM): why not
Maf54 (7:51:22 PM): at your age seems like it would be daily
Xxxxxxxxx (7:51:57 PM): not me
Xxxxxxxxx (7:52:01 PM): im not a horn dog
Xxxxxxxxx (7:52:07 PM): maybe 2 or 3 times a week
Maf54 (7:52:20 PM): thats a good number
Maf54 (7:52:27 PM): in the shower
Xxxxxxxxx (7:52:36 PM): actually usually i dont do it in the shower


SEE COMPLETE IM'S HERE AS REPORTED BY ABC NEWS:


http://abcnews.go.com/images/WNT/02-02-03b.pdf



JOHN WALSH AND HIS BUDDY MARK FOLEY ON YOUTUBE:



Hypocrite Foley on AMW: "If I were one of these sickos..."


http://youtube.com/watch?v=O6BKR4cTmAg



I HAD IT FOR A LONG TIME? ADDITION FOR WOMEN? WHILE REVE WAS HAVING AN AFFAIR WITH HIS GOOD FRIEND LIVING IN HIS HOME AS JOHN WALSH ADMITTED ON CNN LIVE?










THEN WE HAVE MARK LUNSFORD WHO ADMITS LOOKING AT NAKED WOMEN ON PORN SITES ON THE INTERNET. FOX NEWS SAYS THESE PEOPLE ARE PERV'S? AGAIN PEOPLE THAT DO THIS SHOULD WE ALLOW THEM AROUND OUR CHILDREN?



AS REPORTED BY TAMPA NEWS

Along with the images, a list of more than 50 “sexually oriented” Web sites that Lunsford visited on the morning before Jessica disappeared was released by prosecutors last month. Talking in his office Monday, Magrino declined to give an exact number of images that investigators found, but said it was in the “single digits.”
He said while Lunsford said he viewed pornographic images, the questionable images could have gotten on the computer any number of ways, such as through “pop-ups” or by accident.

DO WE REALLY WANT THESE PEOPLE NEAR OUR CHILDREN????? THE PICTURE ABOVE OF LUNSFORD WAS ON HIS MYSPACE PAGE 8-13-07



SOME OF WHAT JOHN WALSH HAD TO SAY ON LARRY KING CNN LIVE ABOUT HIS ADDICTION FOR WOMEN THAT HE ADMITTED HE HAD FOR A LONG TIME. COMPLETE INTERVIEW BELOW:




KING: We're back with John Walsh. In our remaining moments, we want to touch some other bases. Your marriage problems continue. Your wife filed for divorce in 1999, then changed her mind. Then you admitted on this program that you had relationships with other women.





WALSH: Yes, I did. I apologized to her, and I've -- I went off the richter there somewhere, and...



KING: This was during the height of all of your fame? Do you think that had something to do with it?



WALSH: I think my inability to deal with my problems -- I never went to a therapist for 20 years. I think it just -- my own selfishness, my own stupidity, my own ego, all of those things, and I hurt my children, and I hurt my wife, and she's a good woman, and she, you know, we're working very hard at this.



KING: Are you in therapy with her, or?



WALSH: Both of us. Yes. I recommend it to everybody.



KING: Does it help?



WALSH: I do -- I think it helps. I think especially crime victims, and it's not an excuse, people that have been through an awful traumas, I think therapy is a terrific thing, and I thought, you know, I'm the tough guy, I'm the toughest guy, I mean, I can deal with this myself -- I couldn't deal with it. And you know, you thinking not hurting somebody, you know, women can be an addiction, and you have to deal with it...



KING: So you understand men who have that problem?




WALSH: Oh, I had it for years and didn't think I had it. “SO YOU HAD AN ADDICTION FOR WOMEN FOR YEARS? What we really want to know is the truth not just that you were an addict for women. HOW OLD WERE THEY JOHN??? Then you say you understand men that have this problem???



KING: How have your children treated you when it was made public?



WALSH: I think it was a terrific embarrassment for them, but they're wonderful kids, I apologized to them, and they said, you know, you're a human being. You tell a lot of good things. You know, you're a good dad. So you say this:



KING: Everyone was shocked that you so freely admitted it when the story broke, because most guys in that situation -- show me the proof, or, you know, give me the DNA.



WALSH: I think you've got to be a man about it. You've got to step up to the plate. If you've made a mistake, apologize for it, admit it. If you did something wrong and you hurt somebody, admit it. I don't get the denials. Look at what it did to other people that denied it. A president almost got impeached; Gary Condit should have said the first day, you know, I had an affair with Chandra Levy, and he threw that investigation off course. I made a mistake. I made a lot of mistakes. And I hurt -- but, you know, that's the way I was raised, if you do something wrong, you know, stand up, be a man and admit it. And I admitted it, and I apologized, and I'm doing the best I can.



SO HOW CAN THE STATE OF VIRGINA SAY" IT DOESN'T FEEL RIGHT WHEN I SEE THEM TOGETHER"


ARE THEY SAYING PEOPLE THAT HAVE ADMITTED HAVING A ADDICTION FOR WOMEN? OR ARE THEY SAYING MEN THAT LOOK AT NAKED WOMEN ON PORN SITES SUCH AS MARK LUNSFORD????





DR. DAVIDSON SPEAKS OUT!!!!!!





Nation's Top Christ-Based Counselor Speaks for Most Hated Families in Society
Reveals Nation's Hypocrisy On Issues Of Sex Offender Registration





JOHN WALSH SAY'S THIS ON LARRY KING




WALSH: SAYS ON CNN I'm not talking about the 17 year old boy who had sex in high school with a 16 year old girl, under-age. I'm talking about level three predators, the guys that hurt kids, that kidnap kids, the serial rapists that rape 20 and 30 people. There's a line there and those are the really dangerous ones that need to be in this national sex offender registry.




WALSH YOU KNOW WHAT THE LAW SAYS! AS YOU STATED YOU WORKED VERY CLOSE WITH MARK FOLEY ON IT. SO STOP LYING AND STOP HURTING MILLIONS OF FAMILIES AND CHILDREN, SO YOU CAN SELL MORE TV, BOOKS, TAPES AND EXPLOIT YOUR OWN POOR SON'S DEATH, FOR THE SAKE OF THE ALL MIGHTY DOLLAR.





HE CAN SMILE AGAIN NOW ANOTHER CHILD HE HAS HURT!!!!!!!! HE LOVE'S HURTING CHILDREN WITH ALL OF HIS LIES ABOUT PROTECTING CHILDREN? ONLY SO HE CAN GET BOOK SALES AND FOX NEWS CAN GET TV RATINGS PERIOD.



GUESS WALSH NOW WANTS TO BLOW UP SMALL CHILDREN BECAUSE OF HIS LAW AND THE AWA LAW. EVEN YOUNG CHILDREN ARE ON THE REGISTER AS SEX OFFENDERS.


SO THIS IS WHAT HE SAID ABOUT SEX OFFENDERS:


http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/07/25/AR2006072501590.html



REMEMBER WHAT HE SAID ABOVE HE'S NOT TALKING ABOUT HOW DOES HE EXPLAIN THESE CHILDREN?




http://www.detnews.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20071220/UPDATE/712200465/1361




SEE THE BELOW LINK OF ALL OF THE YOUNG CHILDREN HIS LAW HAS RUIN THEIR LIVES, AS WELL AS SO MANY MILLIONS OF FAMILIES!


http://sexoffenderissues.blogspot.com/search/label/ChildSexOffenders


BUT HE SAYS ABOVE THE WORST OFFENDER?????????? SO ARE YOUNG CHILDREN WORST OFFENDERS?? THIS SHOULD SHOW PEOPLE HOW HE THINKS! THIS IS HOW $$$$$$$$ AND NOTHING MORE!



http://sexoffenderissues.blogspot.com/search/label/%2FCrime-Police COPS CHARGED WITH SEX CRIMES OF CHILDREN. THOUSANDS OF COPS CHARGED WITH SEX CRIMES!

http://sexoffenderissues.blogspot.com/search/label/%2FCrime-Teacher NOW LETS LOOK AT TEACHERS WHICH AGAIN YOU ALWAYS TALK ABOUT, THOSE BAD GUYS, AND DON'T HIRE A MALE? SEE THIS IS WHAT WE'RE SAYING YOU HAVE NO CLUE WHAT IS GOING ON OUT THERE PERIOD.




WHY OUR POLITICIANS NEVER LOOKED INTO WHO JOHN WALSH IS? BEHIND THE SCENES AND WHAT TYPE OF SEX ADDICTION FOR WOMEN HE HAD?




THESE LAWS ARE AGINIST HUMAN RIGHTS AS SET FOUTH BY THE UNITED NATIONS AS WELL AS OUR OWN GOVERNMENT AGREMENT WITH OTHER COUNTRIES!

http://www.state.gov/g/drl/hr/


WHAT IF THEY COME TO YOUR DOOR? WHAT WILL YOU SAY THEN?




LIKE THE PEOPLE BELOW AND THEY WILL COME SOON. WE ALL HAVE CHILDREN AND THAT SHOULD BE OUR FEAR! BECAUSE KIDS WILL BE KIDS!

LIKE PASTOR DAVIDSON'S SON LINK BELOW



YouTube.com: http://www.youtube.com/davidSonjustice





NEWS REPORT WILL YOUR CHILD BE NEXT? IF JOHN WALSH HAS A SAY IN IT THE REPONSE IS YES!!!!




NEWS REPORT LINK ABOUT DR. DAVIDSON'S SON



http://www.mmdnewswire.com/prominent-christin-counselors-s-trget-injustice-involving-the-internet-rce-sex-fith-2359.html



DR. DAVIDSONS SON HAS TO REGISTER?



WHILE MARK LUNSFORD'S SON WALKS, HE WAS 18 AND THE GIRL 14 BUT THEN AGAIN DADDY AND HIS FRIENDS GOT HIM OFF WITH 10 DAYS AND NO SEX OFFENDER REGISTRY? IS THIS A RACIAL THING?????



JOSHUA LUNSFORD WALKS FREE WHILE OTHERS ARE LOCKED UP EVEN AS YOUNG AS 4 YEARS OLD AND CHARGED WITH SEX CRIME.


COMPARE DR. DAVIDSON'S SON AND WILSON'S CRIME... THEN ASK HOW DID JOHN WALSH BUDDY MARK LUNSFORD'S SON JOSHUA GET OFF? IT'S STRANGE THAT WILSON IS A BLACK AFRICAN AMERICAN AS WELL AS DR. DAVIDSON'S SON? THEN WE HAVE JOSHUA WHO IS WHITE?????



Wilson, 21, was convicted of aggravated child molestation for having consensual oral sex with a 15-year-old girl when he was 17, during a 2003 New Year's Eve party in Douglas County, just west of Atlanta, Georgia.







DOUBLE STANDARD'S FOR SO MANY WHY?????




WHILE THEY'RE LETTING MCDADE GO ON TO DISTRIBUTING PORN!




But late last year, the Georgia Supreme Court, on a 4-3 vote, turned down Wilson's appeal, and both Douglas County District Attorney David McDade and Baker have opposed moves by his attorneys to have him released.




SEE CNN DAVID McDADE




http://edition.cnn.com/2007/US/07/13/teen.sex/index.html




SO WHY IS JOHN WALSH NOT GOING AFTER HIM UNDER THE AWA LAW HE IS A SEX OFFENDER, OR WAIT WE FORGET HE'S ONE OF THE GOOD OLE BOYS LIKE FOLEY IS A DOUBLE AGENT!




However, David Nahmias, U.S. attorney for the Northern District of Georgia, said earlier this week: "We have advised that the videotape at issue constitutes child pornography under federal law and should not be knowingly distributed, received or possessed outside of law enforcement and judicial proceedings."


DON'T COUNT ON KEEPING YOUR RIGHTS!




International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights

Submitted by the United States of America to the UN Committee on Human Rights Concerning the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights October 21, 2005




7. No one shall be liable to be tried or punished again for an offense for which he has already been finally convicted or acquitted in accordance with the law and penal procedure of each country.

WHY DO WE HAVE JESSICA’S LAW MAKING TENS OF THOUSAND OF FAMILIES NOW HAVE TO SELL THEIR HOMES AND MOVE OR GO BACK TO PRISON? IS THAT HUMAN RIGHTS??? punished again!

WHY ARE OUR POLITICIANS PASSING LAWS LIKE ADAM WALSH ACT? PUNISHED AGAIN! Violation of Universal Declaration of Human Rights!


JOHN WALSH AND HIS PRIDE SAYS TO HELL WITH ALL CHILDREN EXCEPT HIS?



JOHN WALSH AND HIS BUDDY MARK FOLEY WHAT A PAIR!

http://abcnews.go.com/images/WNT/02-0203b.pdf INSTANT MESSAGES FOLEY ABOVE LINK FROM ABC



http://edition.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/0307/15/lkl.00.html


THIS WILL SHOCK YOU AS I HAVE BEEN LOOKING AT THE NET ABOUT CORUPTION OF COPS, MAYORS, POLITICIANS, YOU NAME IT THE'RE HERE!


http://sexoffenderissues.blogspot.com/search/label/Corruption GUESS WHAT FLORIDA SEEMS TO LEAD THE PACK? SO WHO DO WE TELL OUR CHILDREN TO TURN TO??????












THE ONLY PERSON THAT OUR POLITICIANS SHOULD BE LISTENING TO PERIOD!!!! PATTY WETTERLING!!!

WE'RE SURE THAT PATTY WOULD NEVER DO SUCH!

THIS LADY IS NOT ABOUT
MONEY, HATE, FOX TV RATINGS OR VOTE'S! YES SHE LOST
HER SON AS WELL!




Patty Wetterling: The harm in sex-offender laws

http://www.sacbee.com/110/story/377462.html


WHAT HAS DRIVEN JOHN WALSH OF AMERICA’S MOST WANTED

TO DECLARE WAR OF WMD

BETTER KNOWN AS

“WALSH MALE DESTRUCTION”




OF THE WALL STREET JOURNAL!


MOVING ON By JEFF ZASLOW


of the Wall Street Journal 8-23-07








A FOLLOW UP STORY ON TEACHING OUR CHILDREN TO NOT TRUST MEN.
BY JEFF ZASLOW
OF WALL STREET JOURNAL 9-6-07

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB118903209653018615.html

JUST RELEASE STORY BY FT. WAYNE, INDIANA ROBERT L. HORN REPORTER

http://www.journalgazette.net/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20070913/EDIT09/709130393


John Walsh at it again: "TELLING THE WORLD MALE'S ARE NOT TO BE HIRED. THIS IS THE MINDSET HE IS PUTTING IN OUR CHILDREN" Mr. Walsh, host of Fox's "America's Most Wanted," began advocating for missing children in 1981, after his son was killed by a stranger. He knows some men are offended by his advice to never hire a male babysitter. But as he sees it, if a teenage boy wants to experiment with sex, you don't want him using your kids."It's not a witch hunt," he says. "It's all about minimizing risks. What dog is more likely to bite and hurt you? A Doberman, not a poodle. Who's more likely to molest a child? A male!


URGENT STATEMENT BY WALSH!

JOHN WALSH SAY'S ON ON WHITE HOUSE LAWN AT THE SIGNING OF HIS LAW ADAM WALSH ACT.

NOW PAY VERY CLOSE ATTENTION TO HIS WORDS: THIS WILL PROVE THAT HE HAS A HATE FOR MEN!

I really think this bill today is going to send a loud message. It only deals with convicted sex offenders, only the level one, the most violent ones, but it sends a message "You messed up one time, you hurt a woman, you hurt a child, but we have the right now to punish you. We have the right to know where you are. We have the right for that soccer mom to check a Web site and know if there's a convicted serious sex offender in their neighborhood." I think today's going to be a loud voice for a lot of victims that will be in the Rose Garden with my wife and I.


NO MENTION OF A FEMALE SEX OFFENDER'S AT ALL!

NO MENTION THAT THE DEPARTMENT OF HSST
SHOWS MORE CHILDREN ARE KILLED BY THE FEMALE THAT MALE!

JOHN WALSH IS ALL ABOUT MONEY AND TV RATINGS!

AND NEVER PAYS ATTENTION TO FACTS ONLY A TONIC WATER SALESMEN!

REMEMBER PEOPLE IT'S OUR CHILDREN THAT WILL BE DAMAGED AND FAMILIES THAT WILL SUFFER BECAUSE OF JOHN WALSH'S HATE FOR MEN AND THE MALE GENDER!


When a person says's something like this! Just goes to show all that there is a hidden problem within them. Think about it when John Walsh who has the backing of everyone in Washington DC says's jump they jump. So why would an employer not stop and think about hiring a male for working in a market, department store, fast food chain, or any place that they might be around children. Could John Walsh’s statement make a company think?

“DO I WANT THIS LIABILITY OF HIRING A MALE?”


Again talking things that he can’t back up. According to AVMAT> any dog can bite and yes "JOHN WALSH EVEN A POODLE!" Any Dog Can Bite: Even the cuddliest, fuzziest, sweetest pup can bite if provoked. Most people are bitten by their own dog or one they know.


THIS IS WHAT WE’RE SAYING WHEN HE MAKE’S A STATEMENT LIKE ABOVE HE CAN’T AND WILL NOT BACK IT UP WITH FACTS PERIOD!

A RECENT STUDY BY WOMEN’S HEALTH CARE FACTS AGAIN!




Alarming Statistics:

http://www.womenshealthcaretopics.com/reality_of_teen_sex.htm

Alarming Statistics: Despite the 'good news' more young girls (as many as 47 percent) are reporting that they are having sex. More girls in fact reported having sex than boys. This contradicts the traditional belief that boys are more likely to have sex than girls. It also flies in the face of traditional stereotypical beliefs that boys should be careful with regard to sex whereas girls should not have sex at all. Modern societal 'norms' dictate in fact that girls and women should be able to do anything and everything that boys do, and sex is no exception. The statistics prove that this is the case. With facts supporting the notion that more and more young women are having sex, it is vital that parents recognize the need to talk frankly with their children about sex. The old mentality that boys simply 'do it' and girls avoid it is outdated. Girls are more and more becoming the aggressor in all matters, including matters of sex.


OUR OWN US GOVERNMENT SAYS DIFFERENT!!!!!!!!!!

WE WOULD LIKE TO POINT OUT THE TRUE FACTS, UNLIKE JOHN WALSH SAY’S IN SO MANY INTERVIEW’S “THE STUDIES SHOW” BUT NEVER QUOTES THE STUDIES!


SOMETHING JOHN WALSH AND HIS BUDDIES AS HE LIKES TO THROW AROUND NAMES OF PEOPLE ON THE HILL HAVE NOT LOOKED AT?

Perpetrator Relationships of Child Fatalities: (AS CONDUCTED BY UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES 2005.)
Figure 3-5 Victims by Perpetrator Relationship, 2005

Victims by Perpetrator Relationship, 2005



CLICK ON PICTURE BELOW TO ENLARGE:







This bar graphs shows that 40.4 percent of child victims were maltreated by their mothers acting alone; another 18.3 percent were maltreated by their fathers acting alone; 17.3 percent were abused by both their mother and father. Victims abused by a nonparental perpetrator accounted for 10.7 percent.
LINK SHOWS 40.4 % WOMEN AND ONLY 18.3 % FATHERS


http://www.acf.hhs.gov/programs/cb/pubs/cm05/figure3_5.htm


Three-quarters (76.6%) of child fatalities were caused by one or more parents (figure 4-2).7 More than one-quarter (28.5%) of fatalities were perpetrated by the mother acting alone.8

Nonparental perpetrators (e.g., other relative, foster parent, residential facility staff, "other," and legal guardian) were responsible for 13.0 percent of fatalities.
While we all agree that any sexual abuse of a child is wrong so many of our Local and Government Officials have been mislead by people like John Walsh and did not do their homework and use our own Department of HHS, as well as USDOJ numbers before passing all these laws that harm so many families and “CHILDREN” It is sad that Walsh misleads all of them when in fact the HHS studies show 0.3 % being sexual abuse of our children. In Fact most of that is done by a relative, friend, or someone they know or trust.



Links to latest studies by Department of HHS

http://www.acf.hhs.gov/programs/cb/pubs/cm05/figure4_3.htm

http://www.acf.hhs.gov/programs/cb/pubs/cm05/table4_6.htm

http://www.acf.hhs.gov/programs/cb/pubs/cm05/figure4_2.htm



BREAKING NEW BY ASSOCIATED PRESS










Universal Declaration of Human Rights DO OUR PEOPLE ON THE HILL EVEN KNOW IT?


SOME EXCERPTS FROM LARRY KING CNN NONE OF WHICH HAVE BEN EDITED AT ALL YOU CAN READ THEM YOURSELF " NOTICE WE SAID EXCERPTS"


INTERVIEW'S WITH LARRY KING OF CNN! SEE WHAT HE HAS TO SAY ABOUT HIS BUDDY MARK FOLEY.....



WALSH: I think it's media driven. I think there are so many media outlets today that fuel these fires and I think people care and I think a lot of sensationalist, you know, 30-second sound bytes have been there. This woman needs to get justice and a case prepared by this D.A. and these boys need representation and hopefully this community won't self destruct before the trial. “HE THINKS IT MEDIA DRIVEN SO WHY IS HE ON THE AIR ALL THE TIME SAYING AND MAKING UNTRUE REPORTS?” HEY JOHN IS THAT NOT MEDIA DRIVEN?


KING: How about learning their names and watching them enter? There are some people who think that should be private.

WALSH: Well, no. I don't. You know years ago it used to absolutely drive me crazy when the law said that anybody under 18, if they were accused of a crime like rape or something like this, they were juvenile and their names couldn't be publicized. But the victims' names could be publicized, even if the victim was 15 or 16. Imagine that kid going to school that next day, that little girl that had been raped maybe, and everybody knowing her name. I think in this day and age the names they get out. You know it, Larry. They leak out and there's nothing you can do about it.

KING: Why are you shaking your head, John?

WALSH: Because if you're innocent and you're brought in, in the largest case in the history of Aruba, a disappearance of a young woman, you don't change your story ten times. Hardened professional criminals change their story ten times, not usually teenage boys. WHAT STUDY SAYS THIS AND DO YOU HAVE A DEGREE IN FORENSICS LAW? OR IS YOUR GUT AGAIN? And these boys, she has hit the nail on the head, they have lied. They have changed their story. They had days to clean those cars out. And, I believe this kid, the police are now saying that this kid ran with van der Sloot and the Kalpoe brothers and they probably waited for new groups of tourist girls to come in. They probably went to the same clubs. If this kid did sell GHB to van der Sloot or the Kalpoe brothers, they better hold his butt in that jail and keep grilling him and say, "Look, you tell us or you're going to be in jail for a long time" or make a deal with him and at least get some facts from him. SO NOW JOHN WALSH WANTS TO TORTURE ANYONE JUST TO BREAK THEM OR HOLD THEM UNTIL THEY SCREAM LOUD ENOUGH AS THEIR NAILS ARE PULLED FROM THEIR FINGERS.

KING: You have no forgiveness for the pedophile, right?

WALSH: They have the highest rate of recidivism, Larry. They get out. They destroy lives. They eventually progress, some of them, into murder. They're the hardest to catch. They're the most cunning and they destroy people's lives. The psychiatric community says they're not curable. They have a huge rate of recidivism. We never keep them in jail long enough. We never punish them. So, you know what, if we can't put them on that penal colony on Mars, that's where I'd like to send them, and if we can't cure them because we should study and we should study their genetics. We should study their brains. “BUT YOUR LAW SAYS ALL PEOPLE SEX OFFENDERS EVEN CAUGHT MOONING IN COLLEGE, URINATING ON THE STREET” SHOULD WE SEND THESE PEOPLE TO MARS??? In the meantime, this Child Safety Act that I've talked to you about many, many times that passed, flew through the House of Representatives last year, it was written by Mark Foley, a Congressman from Florida, James Sensenbrenner got it through with the bipartisan Democrats and Republicans. It got stuck in the Senate last year. It didn't make it. NOW YOU SAY IT WAS WRITTEN BY MARK FOLEY AND IN ANOTHER INTERVIEW BELOW YOU SAY DIFFERENT AFTER HE WAS CAUGHT? The House reintroduced it. It passed. It would create a national sex offender registry. The marshals would go after them, a guy like this, if he's out there, a guy like that killed Jessica Lunsford, that violated 22 arrests, et cetera, run them down, put them in jail for five years as a penalty. It's stuck in the House of Representatives. I'm begging Joe Biden.

KING: You mean in the Senate.

WALSH: I'm sorry in the Senate. I went and spent 45 minutes with Bill Frist. I know Arlen Specter and Orrin Hatch. I've got Hillary Clinton on the bill. I've got Charles Schumer. Joe Biden has been a champion.

KING: So what's the problem?

WALSH: You tell me will you please? And I'm telling everybody that's watching this show tonight. We need a national sex offender registry. We need to know if these guys move next door to your two little beautiful little boys and the guy just got out of jail, et cetera, SO IT’S OK IF A DRUG DEALER SELLING COKE, CRACK, ECSTASY OR ANY OTHER DRUG’S TO OUR CHILDREN AND THEN ONE OF THEM OVERDOSES?? and it needs to get passed. “SEE HERE LAYS THE PROBLEM YOU TELL EVERYBODY WE NEED A REGISTER AND I WOULD AGREE, HOWEVER WE NEED IT FOR THE COUEYS OF THE WORLD. HAVING SAID THAT YOU DON’T TELL PEOPLE THE PART. AS A RESULT OF YOUR LAW, WE HAVE CHILDREN, PETTY CRIMES ALL ON THE REGISTER NOW” And I'm telling people visit amw.com. We have the sample letters. We'll tell you who your two U.S. Senators are. And, Bill Frist told me he would get it out of the U.S. Senate and I don't know why the hell it isn't out.


KING: We don't know why the pedophile does what he does right?

WALSH: You know...

KING: We don't know why.

WALSH: I don't think they know why. It's a huge drive. It's a sexual urge. They're big time repeat offenders. They ruin kids' lives. I mean you know you're a heterosexual. I don't believe heterosexuality -- and so am I. We're married. (SO WAIT ARE WE TALKING ABOUT PEDOPHILE’S OR SEX OFFENDERS, OR PREDATORS?) THERE IS A VERY DISTINCT DIFFERENCE! But that's not curable. NOW WHERE ARE YOUR STUDIES FOR THIS? Homosexuality, that's their business as long as it's a consenting sex between adults that's not curable. I don't pedophilia is curable. I don't know why they have this drive but I know one [expletive] thing. “BUT YOU HAD A SEX ADDICTION FOR WOMEN FOR A LONG TIME AND YOU SAY IT IS CURABLE”

KING: The sex crime people you are after and want listed, are you defining it? Is there a danger, a guy meets a girl in a bar and they go in a car, and they have sex in a car and a cop stops them, are they sex offenders? Is it clearly written they wouldn't be, even if arrested on a misdemeanor?

WALSH: I don't believe, for example, this child safety act that would create this national registry of sex offenders, I'm not talking about the 17 year old boy who had sex in high school with a 16 year old girl, under-age. I'm talking about level three predators, the guys that hurt kids, that kidnap kids, the serial rapists that rape 20 and 30 people. There's a line there and those are the really dangerous ones that need to be in this national sex offender registry. “NOW WAIT A MINUTE DO YOU KNOW WHAT YOU’VE JUST SAID? THEN TELL US WHY SO MANY PEOPLE ON THE REGISTRY ARE TEENS, CHILDREN EVEN AS YOUNG AS 6 YEARS OLD ARE ON YOUR LAW AND REGISTER? AS YOU WILL SEE BELOW MANY YOUNG KIDS HAVING TO REGISTER AS SEX OFFENDER.

KING: Are you going to get it?

WALSH: I'm telling you, I do not know. Bill Frist promised me, said John, I'm not a lawyer. God bless all the lawyers. He said I'm a doctor, a humanist and I care about this and I will get this out of the United States Senate. I said, Bill, Senator Frist, there are enough co-sponsors, we could use some more Democrats but I believe if it hits the floor, I don't believe anybody would vote against it, something that should have been done years ago.

KING: Senator Kennedy will be here tomorrow. Where is he at on it?

WALSH: He's been a great supporter of mine for years. I see the most vitriolic things going on. This partisanship in Capitol Hill. I've been walking the halls of 25 years, this will be the 25th anniversary of Adam's death, I've never seen such partisan politics. I do have Democrats on this bill. They should put it all aside. Who cares who gets credit? Who cares if Senate is run by the Republican majority now? If the House could pass it with 435 members who don't agree on the number of stars on the flag, if they could pass it twice in the house, why can't the Senate get this passed?

KING: Is Kennedy opposed?

WALSH: I think he's had problems with it. He's always been a supporter of the missing children's bill, and I hope it isn't politics. I hope Senator Kennedy says, maybe I can't get my agenda or what I want to do, but a national sex offender registry is what needs to be done? Please ask him tomorrow.

KING: I will.

WALSH: Let's get it done.

KING: Do you ever think that you're fighting windmills?

WALSH: No, I don't. Sometimes I get very, very frustrated. When this bill passed last year and it didn't make it through the Senate. I went over and saw Arlen Specter and Joe Biden has been a friend of mine for 20 years and Orrin Hatch and they say they are going to get it done and they have all these other things so important, The Patriot Act and stuff.


CNN LARRY KING LIVE Interviews:
With James McGreevey, John Walsh
Aired October 26, 2006 - 21:00 ET


KING: I'll get it home to them tonight and we'll talk more about it. You spoke with us earlier this month, in fact right after it broke you were kind enough to come right on, on the Mark Foley thing. Now that you've had some time to think about it, any afterthoughts?

WALSH: You know I told you that I was completely caught off guard, appalled. First I think you go through the angry because I had worked so closely with him on the Adam Walsh Child Protection and Safety bill. He was there in the Rose Garden on July 27th, the 25th anniversary of Adam's abduction when that bill was signed by President Bush. NOW YOU HAVE WALKED THE HALLS FOR 25 YEARS AND DID NOT EVEN HEAR A RUMOR OR ANYTHING ABOUT FOLEY? COME ON WALSH! And the most ironic part of this is that although they say these e-mails were two years ago, one of the components of that bill, all sex offender registries, all 50 states have uniform sex offender registry, mandatory collection of DNA of convicted sex offenders and making solicitation of minors over the Internet a federal crime. How ironic would that be that he was one of the writers of that bill and could have been prosecuted if he was continuing that behavior? SO WHY DIDN’T YOU NOT GO AFTER HIM ON AMERICAN MOST WANTED AND WALK THE HALLS TO GET MARK FOLEY???? But it just proved one thing to me, as mad and angry as I was that the compulsion to search out minors and adolescents must be so strong that a congressman or whoever, a priest, you know, would risk their career to do this.

KING: Do you put a 16-year-old in the same category you do an 8- year-old?

WALSH: Well, they're still a minor. In most states they're a minor. They're very naive. I mean Mark Foley is a 52-year-old man. He knew that that's wrong by the law.

KING: Inexcusable.

WALSH: Inexcusable and I know that he says that he's an alcoholic. Good, get help. He said that he was molested and that has come out. But I know tons of people that were molested and abused and never went after, you know, tried to solicit sex with a child. It's not right. And, whoever you are, cop, congressman, minister, rabbi or priest, you have to be held accountable for it. NOW YOU SAY ABOVE FOLEY GET HELP? BUT LOCK ALL OTHERS UP FOR DOING THE SAME CRIME???? SEND THEM TO MARS, PUT A CHIP IN THEIR BEHIND AND BLOW THEM UP! THEN YOU SAY ABOVE THEY ARE NOT “CURABLE” STUDIES SHOW THAT BUT NEVER A STUDY IS SHOWN BY YOU?.

KING: We have an e-mail question for John from Vanissa in Hickory, North Carolina. "Has the situation with former Congressman Foley hurt or helped the political atmosphere for helping exploited children?

WALSH: I don't think it has hurt at all. I think people realize that that piece of legislation was long overdue that it's going to change the way we deal with the exploitation of children and convicted sex offenders. And, I think people, the American public are pretty sophisticated, pretty caring and loving people and Mark Foley just happened to be associated with that bill. I don't think it's hurt it That bill will stand the test of time“ YOU SAY ABOVE HE AND YOU WORKED CLOSE TOGETHER WRITING THE ADAM WALSH ACT AND I QUOTE YOUR WORDS “it was written by Mark Foley, a Congressman from Florida” NOW YOU SAY MARK FOLEY JUST HAPPEN TO BE ASSOCIATED WITH THAT BILL???


KING: You use harsh words when you talk about predators on this show, pervert, wacko, do you apply that to Foley?

WALSH: Well, I -- a double agent is what I call him, a double agent. I mean here he is -- I think the people most appalled by his behavior was his staff, the people who work so closely with him. And a couple of them said to me "If we'd known that this was Congressman Foley's predilection that we would have jumped over the desk and choked him. JOHN WALSH WHY IS HE A DOUBLE AGENT AND ALL OTHERS NEED TO BE ON MARS???? OR A CHIP PUT IN THEIR BUTT AND IF THEY GET CAUGHT YOU SAID BLOW THEM UP? So, I think some people were aware of his behavior but it's inexcusable. And I just -- I thought I was, you know, pretty good at getting a gut feeling about these people and...

KING: You never know.

WALSH: Well, you never know and, as Jim McGreevey said, you know, 99.9 percent of the gay community is just as upset about pedophilia and molestation of children as I am. And to lump that category, somebody said "Well Mark Foley's gay. He was in the closet and therefore he's a bad guy because he reaches out to minors.

KING: We've often discussed how pedophilia is not curable in your opinion.

WALSH: Right, right.

KING: Does Foley fit that?

WALSH: He has absolutely convinced me that should we not study these guys absolutely. Is it genetic, probably so. Is it such a strong compulsive behavior that you would lose your whole career as a congressman, your 20-year career because you wanted to have sex with a 16-year-old boy instead of an 18-year-old boy? “AGAIN YOU WAFFLE CAN’T BE CURED, NOW NEEDS TO BE CURED AND FOLEY SHOULD GET HELP? I don't think it's curable and that's why when we look and see the huge rap sheets of these repeat sex offenders, the terrible things they do, we should study them. We should identify them. But right now, the Adam Walsh Child Protection bill is all about at least letting parents know where they are. YES EVEN CHILDREN SO MAYBE A PREDATOR CAN FIND THEM? BECAUSE YOUR LAW MAKES NO DIFFERENCE BETWEEN CHILDREN, MEN, WOMEN ETC.

KING: Has the Foley thing caused you to be mistrustful of others now?

WALSH: No. I still have a great belief in the average person to do the right thing, you know, to be a good person. A lot of wonderful people worked on that bill from both sides of the aisles and Mark Foley got credit for it for help writing it initially. But look at Joe Biden and Bill Frist and Orrin Hatch and Ted Kennedy and people that you and I talked about here for months worked on that bill.

KING: Kennedy came on the night after you were on. He was part of it.

WALSH: You had a lot to do with helping out getting that bill passed by asking him as a gentleman not to attach some of the good stuff that he wanted to put on it. But it became just too cumbersome.

KING: Has Foley had an effect thus far in polling in political races in your state?

WALSH: He's had a huge -- oh, yes, I'm a Floridian. He's had a huge effect in south Florida and I think unfortunately people don't vote for the person, for the man or the woman. All these years I've sometimes endorsed Republican or Democratic candidates because I believe -- my constituency is if they care about victims' rights, children, about persecuting criminals.


And I always say the same thing. Please it's not about political parties. It's about priorities. And I hope people look past Mark Foley. It was the man Mark Foley that made those mistakes that has that compulsion. It has very little to do with the Republican or Democratic party affiliation. WAIT HE HAS A COMPULSION AND SO MANY OTHERS ARE CREEPS, SCUMBAGS, PREDATORS, SEX OFFENDERS, WACKO’S SHOULD BE SENT TO MARS, A CHIP PUT UP THEIR RECTUM AS YOU STATED IN A WASHINGTON POST ARTICLE AND BLOW THEM UP??? And everybody says that there's this giant cover-up, you know, because it's election year. You can look through that. I mean I don't think, I have to question, and I know Dennis Hastert and I know several members of the House, I don't think there's anybody that would be dumb enough that would condone the behavior which is in legal terms solicitation of an adult borders on pedophilia. “SO NOW YOU CALLING MARK FOLEY A PEDOPHILE? I don't think anybody would be dumb enough to cover that up for political gain. That would be like saying, "Well I think I have a serial killer working for me but I'll wait until the elections are over to get rid of him." It's almost insane actually.

KING: The whole story?

WALSH: Well, I mean if there are people that knew about it and they tried to brush it under the rug, then they should be held accountable for it because I haven't heard anybody really talk about the boys, the 16-year-old boys and how this has affected them and if they want justice and what's going to happen to Mark Foley? Well we can’t believe you have not seen this Walsh?

http://abcnews.go.com/images/WNT/02-02-03b.pdf

MARK FOLEY’S IM’S!





WAIT WALSH YOUR LAW SAYS IT’S A CRIME SO WHY ARE YOU SAYING YOU HAVE NOT HEARD ANYBODY TALK ABOUT THE BOYS? AND IF THEY WANT JUSTICE AND WHAT’S GOING TO HAPPEN TO FOLEY? JOHN YOU SAID HE WROTE THE LAW AND THAT IT’S A CRIME THEY HAVE THE IM’S HELLO WAKE UP WALSH??? I keep hearing them saying, "Well, heads should roll and people should resign if there was this big conspiracy." No, listen to the facts and get to the facts. And if somebody should be held accountable then they should. NOW YOU SAY LISTEN TO THE FACTS AND GET THE FACTS? BUT ABOVE YOU WANT TO PUT THE ARUBA BOYS IN JAIL AND HAVE CONVICTED THEM EVEN BEFORE A COURT HAS? THEN YOU MAKE STATEMENTS ALL THE TIME WITHOUT HAVING THE FACTS???

KING: In our remaining moments in the next half hour, we'll be discussing some individual matters that John Walsh is most interested in, various cases. We hopefully along the way have helped him in the past as he tracks people wanted for various crimes. We'll discuss some of those cases. We'll also include your phone calls as well.

KING: Any question about its legality?

WALSH: No, these are people that were convicted in a courtroom, they're only for convicted felons, not people falsely accused, only for level one, the most dangerous. You know, I don't believe -- you and I talked about it. The 18- year-old kid that has sex with a consenting 17-year-old girl is not who should be in the sex offender registry. It's not who should have a chip on him. The guys like the guy that killed Jessica Lunsford, 22 arrests, that scumbag Joseph Duncan, who just traded the death penalty for three life sentences for killing Shasta Groene's mother, stepfather and her two brothers, and that creep said I'll trade you the password to my computer so you can see how many kids I molested over the last 20 years for, you know, not putting me to death. What a coward. But that guy should have been tracked. We agree once on something you have said!!!


KING: Any question about its legality? NOW WE KNOW YOU DON'T KNOW WHAT YOU’RE TALKING ABOUT? BELOW HIGHLIGHTED IN RED AND BLUE!

WALSH: No, these are people that were convicted in a courtroom, they're only for convicted felons, not people falsely accused, only for level one, the most dangerous. You know, I don't believe -- you and I talked about it. The 18- year-old kid that has sex with a consenting 17-year-old girl is not who should be in the sex offender registry. It's not who should have a chip on him. THEN WHY ARE SO MANY IN JAIL??? LIKE GENARLOW WILSON IN GEORGIA? WE DON'T SEE YOU RUNNING TO HELP HIM AND CALLING HIM A "DOUBLE AGENT" OH BUT WE FORGET HE HAS NO MONEY OR PEOPLE TO DONATE TO HIM FUND'S.




HE HELPS WRITE THE LAW WITH MARK FOLEY AND MAYBE HE HAS NOT READ THE LAW OR THE PEOPLE ON THE HILL? BUT HIS LAW PUTS ALL CLASSES, ALL CHILDREN, SMALL CRIMES, WOMEN, MEN, TEENAGERS. EVEN GO BACK 20 OR 30 YEARS NOW AND MAKES THEM REGISTER RETROACTIVELY? THEN HE SAYS HERE THAT IT IS FOR THE MOST DANGEROUS HE SAYS HERE LEVEL ONE, THE LAW SAYS LEVER 3 ARE THE MOST DANGEROUS. SO WHY ARE ALL OF THESE LAWMAKERS MAKING EVERYONE HAVE TO REGISTER? MUST BE BUCKS!!!! MONEY MONEY AND VOTES VOTES! And there is no question of legality. Those guys violated. Justice Department says there is 100,000 convicted sex offenders falling through the cracks, at large in the United States. There is nothing illegal about it. It is about children's rights.

WALSH: With those two beautiful boys you have, how did you not reach across the desk and grab this guy and choke him? WALSH YOU NEED ANGER HELP! NOW YOU ARE SAYING TO LARRY KING WHY DID HE NOT “CHOKE A MAN THAT SO FAR WAS NOT CONVICTED OF ANYTHING" AND YET YOU ADVOCATE TO KING WHY HE DID NOT CHOKE HIM? THAT WOULD BE MURDER MR. WALSH? DO YOU THINK THIS IS THE CORRECT WAY TO UPHOLD THE LAWS OF OUR LAND? WHAT ARE YOU TEACHING PEOPLE TO DO WHEN YOU MAKE A STATEMENT LIKE THIS? “ARE YOU PROMOTING VIGILANTISM TO PEOPLE"

KING: (INAUDIBLE)

WALSH: I know you do.

KING: He hasn't been convicted of anything, John. “YOU MUST REMEMBER LARRY THAT JOHN WALSH CONVICTS ALL BEFORE THEY EVEN COMMIT A CRIME UNLESS IT'S LIKE FOLEY" BUT THEN AGAIN HE'S A DOUBLE AGENT! NOT A CREEP, SCUMBAG, WACKO CORRECT?"

WALSH: You know something, let me ask you this question, and the JonBenet Ramsey case has bothered me for years because everybody knows it was very shoddy police work, that that compromised that case from day one, and that the Ramsey family will never get justice. And Patsy went to the grave with a broken heart, wishing that the police had done a better job. But how could a guy confess to it in Thailand and be flown over to the United States in the business class with the champagne, which completely irritated the whole country, and probably the whole world, and make up this whole fantasy about how he raped her and molested her and not be charged with a false -- at least a false police report or something? And then how could he be lucky enough to go to trial for possession of child pornography, and somebody have stolen or misplaced the computer? I mean he's just a giant mistake waiting to happen. DO YOU THINK THAT HE PAID BUSINESS CLASS OR DID OUR GOVERNMENT? DUMB STATEMENT WALSH WOW DO YOU MAKE A GOOD USED CAR SALESMAN!

KING: Do you believe he harms children?

WALSH: I believe that a guy that could sit and talk about fantasizing having sex with JonBenet Ramsey and saying that he wished he killed her is something wrong with that guy, terribly wrong. And I think he's just a time bomb. And I'm sure that he was -- he was in Thailand when the ice guys, the custom and immigration guys, got him. He was there in the area where expatriates like him go to have sex with small children. ‘NOW WHAT PROOF DO YOU HAVE THAT HE WAS DOING THAT? OR IS THAT YOUR FAMOUS "GUT TALKING AGAIN?" REMEMBER YOUR GUT DID NOT DETECT FOLEY?? He was in Thailand because they don't prosecute you for that. Come on, he's just -- some day you and I are going to be sitting here and say I told you so. WE IN NO WAY CONDONE WHAT KARR HAS DONE. BUT SEE AS WE SAID ABOVE WALSH CONVICT’S BEFORE A CRIME IS DONE.


HOWEVER, WHILE WE THINK KARR HAS SOME PROBLEMS AND NEEDS SOME TREATMENT, AS YOU RECEIVED SO YOU HAVE STATED MR. WALSH AND THAT YOU SAY FOLEY NEEDS HELP? THEN YOU SAY PEOPLE ARE NOT CURABLE? ARE YOU CONFUSED? STUDIES SHOW THAT PEOPLE ARE CURABLE WITH TREATMENT.

WALSH YOU ARE SO FULL OF CRAP THAT YOU THINK PEOPLE ARE SO DUMB AND STUPID. YOU KNOW EXACTLY WHAT’S GOING ON WITH YOUR ADAM WALSH ACT LAW THAT YOU LOBBY FOR…..
YOU ARE SUCH A UN NOBLE SOUL AND TO DO ALL THIS STUFF TO CHILDREN AND THEIR FAMILIES IS SICK. THEN ONE ASKS WHY OUR SUICIDE RATE IS GOING UP AND UP? BECAUSE OF PEOPLE LIKE YOU ARE DRIVING THEM TO IT AND OUR POLITICIANS THAT YOU SPEAK OF THAT HELP. “AS YOU SAID YOU “BEGGED JOE BIDEN”

REMEMBER WALSH YOU SAID THIS WAS FOR THE "WORST LEVEL 3" SO WHY DOES YOUR LAW PUNISH ALL THESE CHILDREN??


JUST A FEW OF THE KIDS THAT YOU SAY ABOVE THE AWA WAS NOT MEANT FOR ONLY LEVEL 3 THE VERY DANGEROUS SO HOW CAN THESE CHILDREN BE A LEVEL 3?????


http://abcnews.go.com/Primetime/LegalCenter/Story?id=1693362


5 YEAR OLD BOY http://infowars.net/articles/december2006/211206toddlerism.htm


8 YEAR OLD BOY AND GUESS WHAT IT WAS A FEMALE BABYSITTER
http://infowars.net/articles/december2006/211206toddlerism.htm


6 YEAR OLD BOY AND GIRL http://abclocal.go.com/wpvi/story?section=special_coverage&id=5074178


"I think (the law) should be more lenient because if it's consensual between both of them, they should be able to do it," said Verbanc, a freshman at the University of Wisconsin-Sheboygan. Authorities "are not going to be able to stop the teens. It they want to have sex, they're going to, whether it's legal or not."State law, however, is straightforward. Anyone who has sex with someone under 18 years of age is guilty of a crime, a felony if the other person is 15 or younger, regardless of consent. (SO LET’S FOLLOW THE MONEY AND JOHN WALSH)This means cases involving rape and those involving consensual sexual contact are often charged identically, with prosecutors given discretion to pursue substantial penalties for the former and offer plea deals for the latter."We can't ignore these things — we have to charge them," said Sheboygan County District Attorney Joe DeCecco. "We take into consideration (if) it was consensual in nature, they were close in age … whether they had an ongoing relationship."

DeCecco said prosecutors will pursue mandatory registration as a sex offender for all felony convictions — explaining that cases serious enough to merit a felony should also merit registration — but state Sen. Glenn Grothman, R-West Bend, said he is hesitant to put any young offenders on the registry."I don't like the idea of 17-year-olds permanently being labeled as sex offenders," he said. "I don't think a 17-year-old with a 15-year-old consensual (sexual relationship) should be on the sex (offender) registry."


Joe, age 14, Wisconsin“A police sergeant indicated that the sex was consensual. My son was very frightened, as the detective was shouting at him and had a gun. He did not write a confession. The detective wrote it for him. Approximately two weeks later, we received papers in the mail indicating that he was being charged with second degree sexual assault


Justin Wilson, age 10, Texas“Justin's stepmother caught him and his 5 year old younger brother 'looking at each other naked.' They were comparing pee pees. Justin was given one year probation, he had to complete 'crisis counseling', and he was required to register as a sex offender for 10 years.”

Pam's son, age 12, Pennsylvania“My son was charged in Michigan with a "felony 1 criminal sexual conduct child under 13." He in fact did indecently touch a boy of 6 years old. He was 12 when this happened. He performed oral sex on him. He has to register for life. At least that is my fear. Now we have the fear also that this new Jessica's Law will make it so he cannot go to school anymore.”


Shannon, age 13, California“The reason for placement was a sexual offense done when I was 13 in California. Basically I engaged in consensual sexual acts with 3 neighborhood boys ages 13, 11, and 8. Treatment involved putting a rubberband appearing contraption hooked up through a computer around your penis while you sat in a dark room with your pants to your ankles listening to various audio recording stories.”


Garrett Daley, age 13, Arizona“Our daughter Devon came to us and said Garrett had been touching her. The night our son was to be awarded his Eagle Scout award, he was arrested and put in jail. The next day, Saturday, the county attorney decided to change his charges to the adult court. On Sunday, our daughter Devon, came to us and told us she had lied. We again went to the authorities but no one would listen.”Anonymous, age 6-10, Washington“I was charged with rape of a child in the first degree and two counts of child molestation in the second degree. I was told it did not matter that most of the abuse had happened under the direction of my stepfather. It did not matter that I was between 6-10 at the time.”

Misty's son, age 8, Washington“He was held in solitary confinement...He was fingerprinted, photographed, and subjected to intrusive questioning. He was berated several times for wetting the bed, and laid in a wet bed all night because he was too afraid to ask anyone for help.”


Anonymous, age 11, Michigan“He is looking at being put on the public registry when he turns 18, along with his picture...Because of the registry and the stigma which accompanies it, we have had suicides, attempted suicides and youths who are ready to give up.”

Linda 's son, age 13, Texas“He was watching another 13 year old boy and his 10 year old female cousin bumping each other fully dressed. My child was charged with sexual assault as well as the other boy, because he did not tell the girl's mother what was happening.”


Matt, age 14, Arizona“I came home from work and Matt was not home. I called and was told that he admitted to everything and was arrested. Matt didn't admit to anything, he was coerced into it. He is on lifetime probation and is never allowed to live at home again. He has been in homeless shelters and may be in one again.”

Anonymous, age 14, West Virginia“He paid with 10 months of his life locked up, then was involuntarily committed to a psychiatric hospital, forbidden to have any contact with his family. Our son had gone through complete psychological testing at The National Institute, Johns Hopkins Hospital, giving complete opposite results and recommendations than these experts.”

Randi's son, age 14, location withheld“My son is a convicted sex offender. A felon at the age of 14...The detectives told me it didn't matter that this younger boy started this contact.”

Janet Boeldt's grandson, age 14, Indianapolis, Indiana (Resolute Treatment Facility)“He was arrested and charged with child molestation. He was involved with a group of kids, mostly around the same age, who were voluntarily performing various sex acts. There was never any accusation of force or intimidation.”

Danny Phillips, age 15, Indianapolis, Indiana (Resolute Treatment Facility)“Every time I met with any counselor/group leader, he or she would try to tell me when I was telling lies and when I was denying details of my offenses during disclosures. They tried to force me to say things that were untrue and disgusting. They tried to make me say that I'd done something to Esther, Joel, Charity and Mom!”

“J”, Indianapolis, Indiana (Resource Treatment Facility)“My son 'J' was accused of molesting his younger brother. He was placed in a sex offender treatment institution. His brother admitted that he had lied because he was mad. 'J' consistently denied doing anything to his brother and passed several polygraphs. They still didn’t send him home.”


See also: Indianapolis Treatment Centers

Anonymous, age 16, Colorado“My son, too, underwent three torturous years of therapy, after accepting an Alford plea because of a false accusation.”

Tony Fillingame, age 17, Texas“My son was a registered sex offender because of an encounter he had with a 13 year old girl who misrepresented her age...Tony was literally kicked out of a sex offender's treatment program, because he chose to confront the leaders about trying to force him to lie.”

Asa Morton, age 19, Texas“She stated she had just turned 17...We had no idea that my son could be charged with sexual assault of a child. Asa was given 8 year deferred adjudication, with lifetime registration as a sex offender. He cannot find work. He cannot live with anyone in his family because of minors. He is now in the county jail.”


BJ's son, age 17, Michigan“The only crime my son had committed was having consensual relations with a girl who was 2 1/2 weeks away from being the age of consent (16). He was in the SO treatment for 14 months and they WOULD NOT release him UNTIL he had admitted to something he didn't do.”

Carolyn's son, age 18, Vermont“My son was convicted of sexual assault on a minor for consensual teenage sex...He had to sign a contract when he entered treatment agreeing to aversion therapy, penile plethysmograph, and lie detector tests. It also stipulated that therapy may involve masturbation.”

Steven, age 16, location withheld“They told me I was sick. They told me I was disgusting. Morally unfit to live.”
Articles and reports

Three-part series in The Texas Examiner:

Branded for Life"Many parents do not know that consensual sex, even when the female is the initiator, is currently being punished by the State of Texas based solely on the difference in ages."

Attorneys Deal with What Is Law"As a prosecutor, my sense is that at least half of the cases of child sexual assault filed with the district attorney’s office involved consensual sex..."Readers respond to story of young lives ruined.


Perp & Victim Bonded for Life"Nikki Rodriguez, 24 is the 'victim.' The 'perpetrator' is her husband and only boyfriend, Frank Rodriguez, 27." Readers respond
Molested (in Salon magazine)“A mother discovers that the legal system's nightmarish 'cure' for child sexual abuse can be worse than the disease.”


Reject (from Overexposed, by author Sylvere Lotringer)“You feel so bad, you start thinking of suicide…I tried to kill myself in jail.”

Swannanoa: An inmate's story (in the Citizen-Times, Asheville, NC)“Joel will be released from the Swannanoa Valley Youth Development Center...in those four years he's learned other lessons, too: He's learned what it feels like to be hogtied for hours...He's learned what sexual abuse feels like...'After they put me on suicide watch, they handcuffed and shackled me.' Joel says he stayed in handcuffs and shackles for about 48 hours. After that, there was no discussion in therapy sessions about what had happened to him, he says. Instead, they returned to talking about his own past, his own transgressions.”

A Question of Abuse (in Mother Jones magazine)“Tony was 9 years old...Juvenile Court put Tony in a 'sexually reactive children's' group...The American Civil Liberties Union Prison Project has sued a number of similar programs for adults...Tony suffered harshness and betrayal from adults; he is depressed and mistrustful.”

Sex Therapy 'Nightmare' Or Cure? (from the Arizona Republic)“The hospital had told the girl to record a sexual fantasy. Then every time she listened to it, she had to use that ammonia...her therapists persisted until one day she tried to kill herself...”

Also: Testimony to the Committee on Children's Psychological Treatment Programs“children are subjected to nude slides of men, women, and children, including photographs depicting bondage.”

Teen Sues Clinic Using Penis Device (from Newsday)He was “forced to wear earphones and listen to pornographic tapes including descriptions of sex between adults and children...Afterward the youth was encouraged to masturbate...”


The Unforgiven (from Spin magazine)“Log on to South Carolina's Internet registry of sex offenders, and listed there...you'll find Lucas Tanner II...he was 12 years old when it happened.”
SO WHEN ONE OR 2 OR ANY FOR THAT MATTER COMMIT SUICIDE BECAUSE OF YOUR LAW WHAT WILL YOU SAY THEN? OH WELL IT’S NOT MY CHILD.


KING: John, you are a noble soul.

“JOHN WALSH IS A CONFUSED SOUL AND BACKS NOTHING UP WITH DATA”


Aired September 6, 2007 - 19:00:00 ET GLEN BECK CNN NEWS

WALSH: Exactly.

BECK: And yet, you touch a 12-year-old, you’ll go to jail for three years. What are we doing? What about one strike, you’re out? Forget about everything else. One strike, you’re out.

WALSH: I’m on the same side that you are. I can’t be objective. I’m the father of a murdered child. A 6-year-old boy that was murdered. THEN WHAT ARE YOU DOING SAYING ALL THESE THINGS ON THE HILL IF YOU CAN’T BE “OBJECTIVE” THIS IS WHAT LEADS ALL TO BELIEVE THAT YOUR AND MARK FOLEY’S LAW WAS A KNEE-JERK LAW AND HAS HURT SO MANY CHILDREN AND FAMILIES THAT PAID THEIR DEBT TO SOCIETY YEARS AGO. AND YOU SAY I’M ON THE SAME PAGE AS YOU DAM WALSH CAN’T YOU HAVE EVEN ONE WORD OF TRUTH IN THAT SOUL OF YOURS? IF YOU’RE ON THE SAME SIDE THEN WHY DID YOU NOT PUSH TO HAVE FOLEY IN JAIL AND ON THE REGISTRY?
We’re not talking about the guy that urinated at Mardi Gras. We’re not talking about the 17-year-old boy that had consensual sex with the 14- year-old girl and they know each other. “JOHN COME ON YOU KNOW WHAT YOU DID AND YOU READ THE LAW LONG BEFORE YOU LOBBIED FOR IT AFTER IT WAS WRITTEN ARE YOU THAT FOOLISH THAT YOU THINK AFTER STATING THE ABOVE THAT THE AMERICAN PEOPLE ARE THAT STUPID AND JUST BELIEVE WHAT OUR GOVERNMENT SAYS. AGAIN WHY ARE SO MANY CHILDREN AND LONG AGO PEOPLE ON THE REGISTER?? WE WANT A CORRECT REPLY FROM YOU WALSH NOT LIP SERVICE OR BS OR LIES STEP UP TO THE PLATE REMEMBER AS YOU WERE RAISED ADMIT WHEN YOU ARE WRONG!

We’re talking about the serious, level 3 sex offender, like the guy we caught last week. Richard Goldberg was a molester for whole -- his whole life. The guy they will put on the FBI`s ten most wanted tomorrow. Molested a child, got out of prison and molested again. Those are the guys that need to be in jail for a long time. I think people have got to wake up and say I’m fed up with it, I’m sick of it, but I want to see the laws change. John Walsh Talks With Reporters on White House Signing of Adam Walsh Act So there are lots of really powerful, good components to this legislation. YES BY PUNISHING PEOPLE FROM LONG AGO AND LOCKING CHILDREN UP, AND MAKING CHILDREN BECOME A REGISTERED SEX OFFENDER.

It was a long battle. Congressman Mark Foley from Florida wrote it about 2.5 years ago, when we were talking about sex offenders in Florida. SO FOLEY WROTE IT AS WAS SENDING IM’S TO UNDERAGE PAGES. THE OLD SAYING GOES THE SMELLER IS THE FELLOW! James Sensenbrenner, the Chairman of the House Judiciary, got it passed three times, the last time being yesterday. And the Senate, on the Senate side, Bill Frist was a champion of the bill; Senator Oren Hatch introduced it to the Senate, along with Senator Joe Biden from Delaware, the democratic senator who became a champion of the bill. Senator Kennedy worked on it. Senator Leahy worked on it. Arlen Specter, the Chairman of the Senate Judiciary, was a very strong advocate for the bill. Diane Feinstein. There are a lot of people who worked hard to perfect and fine tune this bill to make it as tough as it is. I really think it's a true bipartisan piece of legislation. Finally, after almost 2.5 years it is passed and I really think it will impact the way that this country's criminal justice system deals with sex offenders.


I think that we can see what has happen here with John Walsh AND OUR ELECTED OFFICIALS.

SOME INTERESTING LINKS BELOW:


INCLUDING JOHN WALSH ADMITTING SEX ADDICTION FOR WOMEN!

WALSH AND FOLEY WHILE WALSH SAY'S I HAD A SEX ADDICTION FOR A LONG TIME FOR WOMEN, HIS BUDDY FOLEY SAYS HE'S GAY? DOES THAT JUSTIFY WHAT HE WAS DOING ON THE INTERNET WITH YOUNG BOYS? REMEMBER HE WROTE THE LAW AND YOU HELP HIM WRITE THE LAW? OR SHALL WE SAY WORKED CLOSE TOGETHER. SEE THE BUDDIES

HERE ON YOUTUBE http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O6BKR4cTmAg


REFERENCE THE ABOVE
http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/0610/26/lkl.01.html


http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/0604/19/lkl.01.html



This Information Posted by United States Department of Justice


http://www.ojp.usdoj.gov/bjs/cvict_c.htm#relate


As Posted by NCMEC and Co-Founder John Walsh

See Page 15 in PDF THE CHART OF BELOW NUMBERS

http://www.missingkids.com/en_US/publications/NC92.pdf


Endangered runaways represent approximately 71.9 percent of the children reported missing to NCMEC; family abductions 22.9 percent; lost, injured or otherwise missing, 2.8 percent; and nonfamily abductions 1.7 percent. The above reports by NCMEC shows that 71.9 % are runaways why did they runaway should be the question? A child does not just up and go without any reason think about it. As it relates to family abductions 22.9 % that could be many things such as a couple getting a divorce and it’s not uncommon that one parent will take the kids so the other can’t see them, so who is to blame here? Now we’re at 95.8% not abducted by a Sex Offender or Predator but a runaway or family abduction. Then we have 2.8 % lost, injured, or otherwise missing not sure how they would come up with injured if they know that why are they not finding the child? If they know their injured? That leaves 1.7 % of nonfamily abductions not really sure what they mean by this because they don’t give an explanations as to what they mean by this? Nowhere in the report does NCMEC make any statement that a child that was found was attacked by a Sex Offender or Sexual Predators at least anywhere we can read in their studies.

Males were more likely to be violently victimized by a stranger than a nonstranger, and females were more likely to be victimized by a friend, an acquaintance, or an intimate. During 2005 -- About seven in ten female rape or sexual assault victims stated the offender was an intimate, other relative, a friend, or an acquaintance.


JOHN WALSH ON LARRY KING LIVE CNN INTERVIEW

JOHN WALSH
ADMITS TO HAVING A SEX ADDICTION FOR WOMEN FOR A LONG TIME!
THE BIG QUESTION IS SHOULD WE TRUST HIM BECAUSE HE SAY’S its NOT CURABLE!!!!! AROUND OUR CHILDREN???

ACCORDING TO THE BELOW STUDIES YOU MIGHT BE AND COULD HAVE BEEN A THREAT TO CHILDREN, WOMEN OR ANYONE?

Sex addicts lack the ability to control or postpone sexual feelings and actions, with the need for arousal often replacing the need for intimacy. Eventually, thrill seeking becomes more important than family, career, even personal health and safety. The sex addict follows a routine or ritual leading to acting out on desires, and is then fraught by feelings of denial then shame, despair, and confusion.

http://psychologytoday.com/conditions/sexandlove.html#Causes

http://www.savvymiss.com/love-advice/sex-advice/sex-sex-sex-archive/article/the-truth-about-sex-addiction-2486/page-browse/3/sspn//149a277542.html

http://www.savvymiss.com/love-advice/sex-advice/sex-sex-sex-archive/article/the-truth-




KING: There is a sidebar to this, isn't there? There was someone staying at your house?


WALSH: Yes, as a friend, James Campbell (ph)...

KING: Who was having a relationship with your wife?



WALSH: Which I didn't know about.




KING: And you did not learn until much later on that they were having a relationship?

WALSH: No, I did not know. It was devastating news to me, but... What about Reve this guy was staying in your home.



KING: But you kept the marriage together?

WALSH: Well, you know, it was a terrible time, and I thought that this was, you know, this was I wasn't the greatest husband, and we loved each other, and we loved Adam, and I thought, how could I leave this woman? You know? She's dying of a broken heart, I'm dying of a broken heart. I would be a coward.

KING: (UNINTELLIGIBLE).

WALSH: Obviously.

KING: But you stood up for him, right, that he wasn't. Now here's a man having an affair with his wife and WALSH pays all of his expenses?????

WALSH: Yes, I did. I did. I never believed he had anything to do with it. I paid for his lawyer, and what happened between he and Reve was their business, but I knew he wasn't capable of taking that little boy.

KING: Now, many times, with the death of a child, accidental death, marriages break up. One blames the other.




(CROSSTALK)

KING: What kept yours together?

WALSH: I think that we realized that we love each otherthat we had this beautiful little boy and I just -- I thought I would be a coward if I left. That was not the way I was raised, and I figured that somehow, I don't know. We would just stay together and try to get through it. But it got worse. It got worse because all we had in common was the grief, and for me, I couldn't work. My partners paid my bills. My dream project was way over budget. Our house went into foreclosure. They don't care if you're a parent of a murdered child. They'll shut your phone off. They'll shut your electric off. So I had a very tough time, and as I admitted, I was -- I think I was suicidal at the time. I was trying to figure out a way to kill myself.

KING: Were there other children now?

WALSH: No, no...

KING: Still no?

KING: You also wrote a book.

WALSH: I wrote a book about it after all these years, I was so angry at the Hollywood Police when they opened the files after 15 years to see the bungling, the mistakes that were made. And I love cops. And 150 of them died in the line of duty last year. But the cops on this case blew this case. And Otis Toole...




KING: When did John Walsh become this activist?

WALSH: Well, I was so mad about the missing children's bill that I borrowed money from my partners and Reve and I went to the first hearing on Capitol Hill. No other parents of missing children -- murdered children, and we went up there and it was opposed by the FBI and the Justice Department. you as have stated you’re a very angry man. I said, "you know what," I went back to Reve, we had a lot of problems with threats. I had testified against NAMBLA, the North American Man-Boy Love Association, a group of pedophiles.

KING: In fact, the FBI killed a couple of guys threatening you, right?

WALSH: That was after "America's Most Wanted" started, but we had moved three times that year, because we were getting threats over the phone, they were getting our phone number saying we had Megan, we had our new daughter, our beautiful daughter. "We're going to kill your daughter." And I said, Reve, I want to do this. I want to do this show because this is a child killer who's out there, and you and I know he'll kill again, but our life has been -- we had threats, we had to move to safe houses. So why didn't you go after the POPE and all of these priest or are you afraid of GOD WILL GET YOU? All the STORIES you tell???

(CROSSTALK) LARRY KING OF CNN: ABOUT JOHN WALSH SEX ADDICTION FOR WOMEN!

WALSH: Just Reve and I. Everything was falling apart. Couldn't work. I lost 20 poundsAnd he said, "I know what you're trying to do." He said, "I know you. I've been your best friend your whole life." He says, "You're trying to kill yourself and make it look like an accident." He said, "You know what, it's not you," he said. "Your mother would be destroyed Everybody that looked for Adam in your family, you would be a coward. If you killed yourself, no one could



(UNINTELLIGIBLE)." He said, "You're not a coward." And he was right. And -- but if still -- it just got worse until I went to see the coroner, because when I went to see Dr. Ronald White (ph) I think was the pivotal thing. We got 40,000 letters addressed to Hollywood, Florida about Adam. People looking for their children, sympathy letters, people's runaway children. I went up to try to claim Adam's remains. I went to see Dr. White (ph) at night. He's a nocturnal...






KING: What is the difference between those who sexually harm and those who kill?

WALSH: Big difference. The pedophile priest -- and you and I talked about it -- you know, I'm a Catholic, and really, I'm just appalled because if you molested the child, you'd be in jail, if I molested a child. Eight hundred priests have been accused of molesting children -- in my opinion, they all belong in jail, and I'm still a Catholic. There are people who just -- that is their sexual gratification. Of children.





KING: We're back with John Walsh. In our remaining moments, we want to touch some other bases. Your marriage problems continue. Your wife filed for divorce in 1999, then changed her mind. Then you admitted on this program that you had relationships with other women.



WALSH: Yes, I did. I apologized to her, and I've -- I went off the richter there somewhere, and...

KING: This was during the height of all of your fame? Do you think that had something to do with it?

WALSH: I think my inability to deal with my problems -- I never went to a therapist for 20 years. I think it just -- my own selfishness, my own stupidity, my own ego, all of those things, and I hurt my children, and I hurt my wife, and she's a good woman, and she, you know, we're working very hard at this.




KING: Are you in therapy with her, or?

WALSH: Both of us. Yes. I recommend it to everybody.

KING: Does it help?

WALSH: I do -- I think it helps. I think especially crime victims, and it's not an excuse, people that have been through an awful traumas, I think therapy is a terrific thing, and I thought, you know, I'm the tough guy, I'm the toughest guy, I mean, I can deal with this myself -- I couldn't deal with it. And you know, you thinking not hurting somebody, you know, women can be an addiction, and you have to deal with it...




KING: So you understand men who have that problem?

WALSH: Oh, I had it for years and didn't think I had it. “SO YOU HAD AN ADDICTION FOR WOMEN FOR YEARS? What we really want to know is the truth not just that you were an addict for women. HOW OLD WERE THEY JOHN??? Then you say you understand men that have this problem???

KING: How have your children treated you when it was made public?

WALSH: I think it was a terrific embarrassment for them, but they're wonderful kids, I apologized to them, and they said, you know, you're a human being. You tell a lot of good things. You know, you're a good dad. So you say this:




KING: Everyone was shocked that you so freely admitted it when the story broke, because most guys in that situation -- show me the proof, or, you know, give me the DNA.




WALSH: I think you've got to be a man about it. You've got to step up to the plate. If you've made a mistake, apologize for it, admit it. If you did something wrong and you hurt somebody, admit it. I don't get the denials. Look at what it did to other people that denied it. A president almost got impeached; Gary Condit should have said the first day, you know, I had an affair with Chandra Levy, and he threw that investigation off course. I made a mistake. I made a lot of mistakes. And I hurt -- but, you know, that's the way I was raised, if you do something wrong, you know, stand up, be a man and admit it. And I admitted it, and I apologized, and I'm doing the best I can.


IF YOU WISH TO POST A COMMENT PLEASE DO SO AT THE BOTTON OF THE PAGE







































































































































































































































































































































































































































































































































































































65 comments:

Anonymous said...

Are you kidding me? How did this come about and I am going right now to cnn and see this stuff. If it's true I will kick my TV when he comes on what a fool if it's true. Now I saw where Foley might get off and that is a bunch of crap. Maybe their brothers.

Anonymous said...

I have been reading alot about him and all that you have said here seems to be correct. What is shocking is what I have heard about Foley getting off and that he will not let the FBI or Florida police get his computer. That is insane and stupid. Don't they belong to the Government??

Anonymous said...

Very interesting part about Foley and I also agree that Walsh has something to do with it all. Now that Gonzales is gone maybe people will start to see the light behind these bad guys.

Anonymous said...

Gonzales is gone but he needs to be replaced by someone that knows the difference between a predator and a sex offender. A sex offender can be a drunk urinating on the street.

Anonymous said...

Seems to us as a family that someone should really look deep into John Walsh pass.... If he had a sex addiction and chances are he still has it. If not then so many others need to the same doctor he got to find out how to cure a sex addiction for women. It's our thought he has never gotten over it and still has it. So hey Walsh get on with more of your lies and bullshit. You are so bad of a mouse because there is no way your a man that is really interested in Children only money and Fox News is the same.

Anonymous said...

We have to say after reading this post that there seems to be some hate here in John Walsh. Like so much that we read on your CNN links. It seems that he wants to convict everyone. I love the part about Foley he calls everyone else names and then calls Foley a double agent. This John Walsh is not a bright he is only a boastful, loud mouth with noting to support his Bull...

Anonymous said...

We have also read tis blog and it would appear that there are some problems with John Walsh. Even the one part that addressed the Teir 1 and the kids was not meant to be on register. He is a liar and he knew what was in the AWA as "HE STATED HE WORKED VERY CLOSE WITH FOLEY ON THE BILL".. What is he doing? The part about men and then he says that he knows some men will be upset with him??? What is he crazy or what??? This guy needs a life.

Anonymous said...

Thanks fo rletting us know it was nice to read a blog that had all facts and I really like the NCMEC stats. What are the doing over there except taking money from people.

Anonymous said...

While it appears to me that John Walsh and Mark Foley has doped the American people once again. I was charged with urinating in public 7 years ago and now have to be a RSO I have never touch a child and when I read what he said here about it was meant to be only about PREADTORS?? Then why is my family suffering Mr.Walsh and my children? I am so angry at you and Foley at the pain you have cause my children and my entire family. As you said in here to Larry King Reach across the desk and choke him meaning that Karr guy. Well If you had balls enough to be a man come and get in the ring with me just 5 minutes. This is not suppose to happen to people like us and also to so many others. Now you have made their lives a mess, are you happy? Does that bring poor Adam back? Does it make you happy that you and Foley have cause so much pain on others which I personally think you get off on doing that. This by far is the best detailed blog on you I have seen. Right down to that fake youtube video that you and Foley did. YOUR A SICK MAN WALSH!!!!!

Anonymous said...

I have to agree that John Walsh is a what we call a mouse or man with "LITTLE MANS DEIASE" somewhere some how maybe he's been up on the Hill to long and now he has become one of the above the law guys. I can assure all that I will email this blog to everyone that I can. This is wrong as I put my daughter to bed just now and he came in my mind. He is trying to turn all children against their fathers. Well Walsh you will not and I will tell you one damn thing I will die before you hurt my children.

Anonymous said...

Hey I am the wife of a SRO and we have been married now for 12 years and he was approached last year and was told that we he had to register for a crime he had 15 years ago. We have 3 children and he is a great daddy and just because he had a problem. Like you had and or still have John Walsh I be dam also if I will let you go on like this and hurt so many people. You are a Devil if I have ever seen one. GOD BLESS YOUR SOUL BECAUSE YOU WILL NEED IT.

Anonymous said...

So Walsh tell me why is it that you view Foley a Double Agent and you call everyone else such bad names. You are a fool and I agree that you have a sickness. Get help you damm fool. I would also like to get you in the ring for 5 minuites. I would even pay you to try and kick my butt.

Anonymous said...

I would suggest that we all start a law suit and get this vigilante.

Anonymous said...

I am outraged at this I work for the Government and find that we have this going on in the back room? I am sending an email to his show AMW.

Anonymous said...

I will tell Mr. John Walsh one thing and that is my son has been babysitting now for 3 years and never never had any problems at all. So where in the hell does he come up with his bull crap? I read here about his sex addiction for women and maybe someone should look into that as well as that creep Foley. How dare Walsh compare my son to a dog like the person that wrote this said.

Anonymous said...

While reading all of this stuff and seeing John Walsh now trying to stop males from being baby sitters. What is he doing here? While we agree with you that he is hiding something for many years now and to attack males without any basis as you have stated is wrong. We have also read the new report about sex and girls as well as the Department of Justice report. So where is the congressman and senators getting all of their information? Are they like you've said taking John Walsh's GUT talk. If so they should all be thrown out on their head. Walsh is a fool and needs to get on meds for madness. As it relates to Foley he is as bad a Vitter and the rest but hey " ABOVE THE LAW"

Anonymous said...

John Walsh I hope you will read this blog. First I think that it tells all about you helping cover up Foley? You are a man that found a way to get out of the hotel business at the taxpayers expense. You need some mental help before you call all men creeps and scumbags. What were you with your sex addiction for women. A scumbag, creep what?

OnePinky said...

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/07/25/AR2006072501590.html

PASADENA, Calif., July 25 People who molest children should have chips embedded in the rectum that would explode if they violate their parole, "America's Most Wanted" star John Walsh told a photographer for Fox and father of two at Summer TV Press Tour 2006 as a couple dozen speechless TV critics looked on.

Anonymous said...

It was mentioned on a Wall Street Journal Forum that John Walsh and Mark Foley is responsibal for this act and it was suggested that this may be the reason Foley doesn't want his computer open to investigators

THE "NO MORE VICTIMS" ACT OF 2007


INTRODUCTION:

Due to the purported high rate of sex crimes and the public's demand
that the government take whatever steps necessary to protect the
children from adults who prey on them; I would like to introduce
the "No More Victims" Act of 2007. The "No More Victims Act" of 2007
picks up where Megan's Law and others like it left off. The common
thread with all these laws is what to do after a crime has been
committed and fails to address any preventative aspect. In order for
there to be "No More Victims" our focus must now be on prevention of
these crimes.

It has already been well established that the Federal Government and
States have a "legitimate governmental interest" in protecting the
public, especially the most vulnerable among us, America’s children.
Additionally, the courts have ruled and the general public accepted
that the rights of victims and/or would be victims, take precedent
over the rights of those that "may" pose some future threat to
society based solely upon empirical data and risk assessments, which
are tools which "predict" future behavior.

It has also been well established - and upheld by numerous courts
that what is currently known as the "Sex Offender Registry" is not a
punitive scheme, but a regulatory one.
Designed to alert the community of those with a risk towards
committing some future act.

Given that upwards of 90 percent of new sex crimes are committed by
someone who is NOT currently on the sex offender registry, not known
to law enforcement, and is not on community notification , and
cloaked in anonymity, lawmakers have a duty to adopt the following
measures to put an end to sex crimes for once and for all.

Since they have a stated "legitimate governmental interest" in
protecting the public and since the techniques proposed herein would
guarantee upwards of a 100%, if not a full 100% rate of success, it
is incumbent upon lawmakers to adopt this act, so that there can
be "No More Victims"

I introduce to you the following ACT, which shall be hereby known as
the "No More Victims Act of 2007".

UNDER THE ACT:

All persons, both male and female, age 18 and over must submit to a
plethysmograh and given a risk assessment while under polygraph. The
plethysmograh purports to have a 100% effectiveness rate in
predicting who will offend, is FDA approved, and already in use in
the United States. Given the recent high rate of offenses among
teachers, clergy, governmental and law enforcement officials, and any
other person in a position of trust or authority I move to start
with those individuals first, as well as with any other person that
maintains a position where working among children whether paid or
voluntary.


Based upon the results of the plethysmograph, polygraph and an
empirical risk assessment, each individual who cannot "pass" shall be
placed on a public "high risk" registry along with their assigned
risk level.

The site must include the following:
1. a current photo
2. risk level
3. date of birth
4. living address
5. name of employer and work address
6. If attending and educational facility, the name and location
of said facility
7. all e-mail addresses and online identifiers
8. List any/all known deviations from currently accepted
societal norms.
9. Individuals who pose a risk must obtain a yearly driver's
license or state issued non-operating identification card. The image
must, within 3 business days be submitted to the agency responsible
for maintaining the sex offender website.
10. ANYONE WHO REFUSES TO SUBMIT TO THE ACT WILL BE AUTOMATICALLY
ASSIGNED A RISK LEVEL OF THREE AS THAT CAN ONLY BE AN INDICATION THAT
THEY HAVE SOMETHING TO HIDE AND A REASON TO FEAR THIS ACT.

In order to withstand any constitutional challenges which may arise,
any prior criminal act which is discovered to have occurred via the
risk assessment and prior to the enactment of this act cannot be held
criminally liable based solely upon the information derived from the
assessment. However, such acts must be considered when designating
the risk level said individual poses to society.

We foresee no challenges in respect to constitutional rights
violations as the sex offender registry is merely a tool for the
public, to warn them of those that "may" pose some future risk to
society and the intent is to prevent sex crimes. This "Act" merely
expands the public's awareness and would be a vital tool in the
prevention of crimes as well as having the potential to catch those
who have already committed crimes but have not been caught or
prosecuted. Additionally, the courts have already ruled that
registration is regulatory and not punitive in design and therefore
The "No More Victims Act" will easily withstand constitutional
challenges on that ground.

Anonymous said...

THE POST ABOVE WAS 'NOT' WRITTEN BY EITHER MARK FOLEY OR JOHN WALSH.

It was written by 2 women who are making a point about how ignorant the sex offender laws have become. It is a satire not a real act!!!!

I am not a John Walsh fan at all. He is a hateful man who is trying to distroy this countries constitution and our family unit.
Christians should take note of what he is trying to do!!!!!!!

Mark Foley is a sex offender and should be labled as such, but our government plays favorites. There is no "EQUAL JUSTICE" any longer in the United States.

Linda said...

At this point in time, it matters not whether the No More Victims Act is satire or true. I believe it to be TRUE SATIRE because, Walsh and Foley were real close. They passed the AWA behind closed doors as Non-controversial. Congress did not get the opportunity to debate ANYTHING. This is costing Billions and Billions. the National Association of State Legislators don't know how to implement it. It is the second most controversial subject that I know of, next to the war. It affects every village and hamlet across this country. Children as young as 5 years old have been put on a sex registry. And I could go on and on about the ruined lives caused by this AWA, which protects NOT ONE PERSON and yes, I believe this No More Victims Act could be passed if the government wanted to, without constitutional muster. It is all legislated as Reglatory without constitutional protection. My opinion. The government has ALREADY BEGAN the process. Thanks Jonh Walsh for destroying the Constitution of the United States!!! You destroyed it for EVERYONE!!!!!

Linda said...

http://hrw.org/english/docs/2007/09/06/usdom16819_txt.htm

The federal Adam Walsh Act, passed in 2006, will exacerbate the problems with state sex offender laws. It forces states to either dramatically increase the scope and duration of registration and community notification restrictions – including requiring states to register youths as young as 14 – or lose some federal law enforcement grant money. Compliance with the Adam Walsh Act will preclude states from adopting more carefully calibrated and cost-effective registration and community notification policies. At least some states are debating whether the costs of complying with the law outweigh the benefits. Human Rights Watch urges reform of the Adam Walsh Act.

Letsgetreal50 said...

OPERATION AWARENESS.COM



MULTIPLE STATE'S SEX OFFENDER RECIDIVISM STUDIES EXPOSE FRAUD UPON THE AMERICAN PUBLIC BY LAWMAKERS AND MAINSTREAM MEDIA


September 12, 2007


We’ve all heard the catch phrases: “ They cannot be cured”, “They have the highest recidivism rates out of any other type of criminal” and “Its only a matter of time before they re-offend again”


We hear these types of claims, stated as fact again and again by mainstream media and politicians. Indeed, even when lawmakers pass new laws pertaining to sex offenders these phrases are found again and again throughout the minutes of legislative hearings across the country. Numerous studies which have been bought and paid for by the American people tell a much different story however. In fact, these studies clearly demonstrate that the exact opposite is true.


Why are they all lying? The short answer: money, ratings and control. Fear has always been a great motivator throughout history to get people to submit to things they would not ordinarily submit to. The laws that have been created under the guise of protecting the public undoubtedly have a very chilling effect on the constitution and create a springboard for further abuses which will ultimately affect us all.


Instead of using the information contained in the studies-which may very well hold the key to making a significant reduction in the number of sex crimes, they create sound-bites and catch-phrases in an attempt to scare the public for votes, ratings, and corporate profit - all at the expense of our children. If the laws they have created were working (which they are not) Dru Sjodin, Jessica Lunsford, and Carlie Brucia would still be alive today.


Most if not all studies clearly define which sub-categories of offenders pose the most risk, make up the bulk of recidivism and pose the greatest danger to society. Yet, instead of focusing on this specific sub-group of offenders, and tailoring legislation and attention of those most dangerous, they lump everyone convicted of a sex crime together. As a result the American public is mistakenly led to believe that all are highly dangerous ticking time bombs. IF this were true, given the fact that there are over 600,000 registered sex offenders in this country, we could have a 24 hour news channel devoted to nothing but repeat sex offenders. The reason registered sex offenders who do commit another sex offense make the evening news is because it is RARE!


Lawmakers and the media are not only defrauding the American public, they are also effectively doing society and children a huge disservice - creating an unnecessary overblown climate of fear and anxiety, while continuing to put America’s children at risk.


Take a look at some of the findings from these studies. Links have been provided so that the studies can be viewed in their entirety. Pay close attention to the number of “new sex crimes” committed by registered sex offenders. This is quite different from technical violations and failure to register. We think most readers will be shocked at what these studies and statistics reveal.


The notion that most sex offences are committed by strangers, that sex offenders have high rates of recidivism, and that treatment does not work is NOT supported by the extensive and growing body of research regarding registered sex offenders.



Here is a glimpse of what these studies reveal, which proves that what is happening is the exact opposite of what the American people are repeatedly being told.


ARIZONA REPORTS A 5.5% RECIDIVISM RATE FOR A NEW SEX CRIME. THIS WAS A FIFTEEN YEAR STUDY DONE BETWEEN 1984 AND 1998

http://www.azcorrections.gov/adc/faq/recidivism.asp


WYOMING REPORTS RECIDIVISM RATES BETWEEN 2% AND 7.5%

THEIR STUDY COVERS A FIVE YEAR PERIOD BETWEEN 2000 AND 2005

http://legisweb.state.wy.us/PubResearch/2005/05RM078r.pdf


MINNESOTA REPORTS AFTER AN EIGHT YEAR FOLLOW UP A RECIDIVISM RATE OF 10%. THEY ARE CAREFUL TO NOTE WHICH CATEGORY OF OFFENDERS POSE THE HIGHEST RISK, THOSE BEING INDIVIDUALS WHOSE VICTIM WAS A STRANGER.

http://www.doc.state.mn.us/documents/04-07SexOffenderReport-Recidivism.pdf


OHIO REPORTS A RECIDIVISM RATE OF 8% AS A RESULT OF THEIR 10 YEAR STUDY. RAPISTS WITH ADULT VICTIMS WERE THE HIGHEST RISK WHILE THOSE CONVICTED OF INCEST WERE THE LOWEST RISK WITH A 7.4% RECIDIVISM RATE.

http://www.drc.state.oh.us/web/Reports/Ten_Year_Recidivism.pdf



To put things in perspective, DUI recidivism hovers around 50%. Given the high number of fatalities each year caused as a result of drunk driving accidents, for example, During 2005, 16,885 people in the U.S. died in alcohol-related motor vehicle crashes.This does not include victims who become permanantly disfigured and/or disbaled as a result of DUI related accidents. Many of them are children.
http://www.cdc.gov/ncipc/factsheets/drving.htm


Additionally over 1,400 children die each year at the hands of their own parents due to abuse and neglect.


Sex crimes are a terrible social ill and there are ways to prevent them. The knowledge and information that is needed to make effective laws IS available and we need to demand that our lawmakers acknowledge this information and start using it effectively.


What kind of politician would lie, ignoring vital information and hard evidence that could effectively protect our children? Here are a few:



“Because of high recidivism rates, Congress can and must do more to ensure that offenders who could strike again are not roaming our streets,” Congresswoman Nita Lowey


"Studies have clearly shown that sexual predators have the highest recidivism rates," Senator Frank Padavan (R-C, Bellerose)


“With the high-rate of recidivism of sex offenders, the state must have the ability to provide additional rehabilitation to those who pose a threat to our communities," Senator John J. Flanagan.



“Studies show that sex offenders are four times more likely to be rearrested than other criminals.” Congressman Vito Fossella (R-NY13)



“Sex offenders are not petty criminals. They prey on our children like animals, and they will continue to do so unless we stop them. We need to change the way we track these pedophiles.” Former disgraced Republican Senator Mark Foley, FL



We know that the recidivism rate of convicted child molesters is extremely high. When many leave the penitentiary, they continue their ways against our greatest resource, children,” Ted Poe Representative Texas



“There are over 500,000 registered sex offenders across the country, and statistics have shown that the recidivism rate for those criminals is high.” Representative James f. Sensenbrenner(R) Wisconsin


"Recidivism rates are alarmingly high" for sexual offenders." Rep. Earl Pomeroy (D) of North Dakota




“Unlike other criminals, sex offenders pose a unique challenge to law enforcement and communities due to high recidivism rates.” Representative Anthony D. Weiner NY

UPDATE 09/14/2007

PATTY WETTERLING OF THE JACOB WETTERLING FOUNDATION SPEAKS OUT!

http://www.sacbee. com/110/story/ 377462.html

ST. JOSEPH, Minn. -- My son Jacob was kidnapped on Oct. 22, 1989. Neither his brother nor his friend saw the man's face. He was masked, he had a gun and he ordered them to run to the woods. By the time they looked back, Jacob was gone and so was the man. Since that day, I have been on a journey to find him and to stop this from ever happening to another child, another family.


But I'm worried that we're focusing so much energy on naming and shaming convicted sex offenders that we're not doing as much as we should to protect our children from other real threats.
Many states make former offenders register for life, restrict where they can live, and make their details known to the public. And yet the evidence suggests these laws may do more harm than good.

Jacob's Law was the first federal attempt to prevent convicted sex offenders from repeating their crimes after release. It was the outcome of my unwanted education in sexual violence against children.


Soon after Jacob was taken, I learned that sexual motives are usually behind child kidnapping. That was a thought totally out of my realm of consciousness. Who would do that? Who would sexually harm a child? As the search for Jacob went on, I asked law enforcement, what do you need? An investigator told me: A ready list of potential suspects, a central database of offenders convicted of sexual violence against children.


The Jacob Wetterling Crimes Against Children Sex Offender Registration Act was part of the 1994 Crime Bill signed by President Bill Clinton. Our goal was to give law enforcement a tool to help build safer communities. Back in 1990, when we first recommended registering convicted sex offenders, we were met with resistance: "You can't do that. These people have rights!" How times have changed. Few people today are concerned about the rights of sex offenders. Most now complain our laws are not tough enough.


But they might be missing some basic facts. First, in most states "sex offender" covers anyone, including juveniles, convicted of any sexual offense, including consensual teenage sex, public urination and other non-violent crimes. Second, Jacob was the exception, not the rule: more than 90 percent of sexual violence is committed by someone the child knows. And third, most shocking to me, sex offenders are less likely to re-offend than commonly thought. A Department of Justice study suggested ex-offenders have a recidivism rate of 3 percent to 5 percent within the first three years after release.
Another study found that, after 15 years, three out of four do not re-offend.


Shortly before Jacob's Law was passed, Megan Kanka was kidnapped, raped and murdered. Her parents felt it wasn't enough for law enforcement to know where sex offenders were: they thought we should all know. Maybe, if they'd known that there was a convicted sex offender living next door, their child would be alive today. Megan's Law was created to let people know when a violent offender was released into their community, so they could talk to their children and perhaps save another child from sexual violence. But the law has been expanded so that now anyone with an Internet connection can download details about almost any offender, whether or not they pose a risk, and whether or not they live nearby.


Are these policies working? Are our "get tough on sex offenders" laws having the desired effect? Human Rights Watch has taken on the challenge of looking at sex offender policy to see what parts are working and what aren't.
This week it published a 143-page report, "No Easy Answers: Sex Offender Laws in the United States." The researchers examined whether we are building safer communities with these laws, and what issues policy-makers should consider. HRW found that many laws may not prevent sexual attacks on children, but do lead to harassment, ostracism and even violence against former offenders. That makes it nearly impossible to rehabilitate those people and reintegrate them safely into their communities -- and that may actually increase the risk that they'll repeat their crime.


We need to keep sight of the goal: no more victims. We need to be realistic. Not all sex offenders are the same. Not all sex offenses are the same. We need to ask tougher questions: What can we do to help those who have offended so that they will not do it again? What are the social factors contributing to sexual violence and how can we turn things around? None of us want our loved ones to be victims of sexual violence. None of us want to be the parent or sibling or child of a sex offender. But since the vast majority of sexual assaults are committed by someone known to the family, sexual violence becomes personal very quickly. It affects all of us.
We need better answers. We need to fund prevention programs that stop sexual violence before it happens. We need to look at what can help those released from prison to succeed so that they don't victimize again -- and that probably means housing and jobs and treatment and community support. Given that current laws are extremely popular, taking truly effective measures may exact a high political price. But that's surely not too much to pay to prevent the kidnap, rape or murder of another child.


About the writer:
Patty Wetterling lives in St. Joseph, Minn. She and her husband are co-founders of the Jacob Wetterling Foundation, which works to prevent sexual violence against children. She wrote this for Human Rights Watch, 350 Fifth Avenue, 34th Floor, New York, N.Y. 10118-3299; Web site: www.hrw.org. Distributed by McClatchy-Tribune Information Services.




Warning: The entire contents of this site, both written and photographic are copyright protected. Any unauthorized use, misuse, alteration, either in part or in whole of any of the information provided herein without the express written consent of operationawareness.com will be prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law as allowed under the DMCA act.

Anonymous said...

I am a mother and after seeing Mark Lunsford my space page on this site. I would like to know where the hell my money is that I sent him last year? I am outrage at this and find that like it says here Foley, Walsh,and Lunsford all a cover up and lies. Has this site open my eyes period. To think that Charlie Geist would ask him to run for a seat is sick. Now I know whey he did not run and that is because people and the press would find out who he really was. As it relates to John Walsh I really did like his show but now I can also see it's is all about money also. All of this is starting tocome together in Florida. ONE BIG COVER UP STATE and protect the liars. To hell with the kids just lie and give me money. Well Walsh Lunsford and Foley I hope all of you burn in HELL!!!! For what you've done.

Anonymous said...

What in God's name were these 2 guys thinking that no one would ever find them out? Now I know why he did not run for office in our state. This guy Lunsford is a weird'o period. As for Walsh well given what he said on CNN. Ther is no way I would allow my children around him as far as that goes either of them.

Anonymous said...

The real scary part is that this kind of regulatory legislation has
already been enacted with sex offender legislation and the Patriot
Act and has one purpose. Destroy the constitution for EVERYONE and
control the country through a one party system and one world
government. The constitution is what stands in the way.

Go to sleep my little sheeple while I take everything from you

Watch This
http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=123_1190423024

Look at this

http://www.inquisition21.com/

Anonymous said...

I had no idea that this was the people that are behind these laws. They should be locked away for doing this to our families and children.

Anonymous said...

If I had one wish it would to bring Adam and Jessica back so these two guys would never hurt anyone again. They are both as bad as a sick perverted as people get.

CBS said...

Hey, how about all you anons come out of the closet because you are all sounding like one person, what are you so afraid of?
And while you are at it, try to learn to spell and use proper grammar because every thing that I read on this blog looks like one long run-on sentence; not to mention that the Larry King interviews with John Walsh look doctored with no valid proof.
You're beginning to sound like a Jan Kruska/Amanda Rogers wannabe that it would not surprise me in the slightest that you are Jan Kruska behind this blog, the "Peg Bundy" sex offender who wants to abolish the sex offender registry so she can go and pick up her boyfriend at middle school and not get busted for it LOL.

www.jankruska.com

Jan said...

I must say that this is the worst thing that I've seen. This Mark Lunsford and John Walsh should be hung by their ???? For hurting so many children and even families. If the have pain we all have some sort of pain guess we all should start a Foundation to get money. I lost my son in the war and did not get anything at all. But I see no one crying for me.

Ron Allwood said...

I have found that by giving to the JML Foundation that after seeing this site I want my dam money back. This Lunsford A$$$ hole is a creep period. I knew all along something was strange about him. When I read the news on him, furthermore I was shocked to know that Walsh had a sex addiction. I could not believe it so I went to CNN and did a search. What I read was sick of him and he should not be allowed around children period!!!

Abraham Golden said...

Dear CBS I am not sure who and or what you're talking about? I have found this site to be one of the most accurate on here about Walsh and Lunsford. As it relates to Larry King CNN I think you should read it again. I have just finished reading because of the doubt you put in my mind. The entire transcript are on this site. I am not really sure who you are attacking? Who is this person that you are speaking of? As far as people have typo's and proper grammar well that shows how shallow you are in understand people. I guess we all wish we could be as perfect as you!

Abraham Golden said...

CBS I forgot something " SO I GUESS YOU SUBCRIBE TO THIS EXPOSURE TO OUR CHILDREN OF LUNSFORD ON HERE?" Sound to me like you might be a sex offender yourself? Are you when people talk like you they have something to hide? So tell us all who and what you are and by the way where is your name? For sure your not CBS Television LOL!

Robert Willington said...

I have been doing some stories on Human Rights and ran across this site. I must say that it was a eye opener to read the CNN reports on here. I had no idea that John Walsh had a sex addiction for women for a long time. Now he says he's a child protection person? I would not let either one of these perverts around my children after reading all of this. Someone said on here that looks like the CNN was edited. Well from what I've read they are not he did in fact admit it. As far as Mark Lunsford goes we have a group of people as Christians that will ask that the people sponsoring his site to stop now. Our Children have no right to have been exposed to his perverted ways. By the way I am not a SEX OFFENDER just a person that is looking up research. So I am not bias in any manner. The only thing that we need to find out is who is behind all of this mess.

We will be emailing 30,000 people this site and see what they think.

PS: I do think people should put their names here and not anons, and even the one CBS.

Alice said...

I will say one dam thing if I would have known that John Walsh had a sex addiction for women. As reported here on CNN and yes I read it all the transcripts as posted here. What as he would say he is a SCUMBAG, WACK, PUT A CHIP IN HIM! I would never never never let my children around this creep, he sounds like he is about to have another sex attack. Lunsford you should be locked away in creeps-ville!!!! PERVERT!

Bob said...

Mark Foley why don't you give up your computers? If noting to hide then give them up you idiot!

Nancy Wright said...

I have to say after reading all of this about these very bad people and what they're doing is the biggest sin of all times. I read for the first time the Human Rights Law that our United States has agreed to as well. I am not for RSO or Against them. I have read so many reports about children and families being hurt by these laws. Is this God's way of ending the world? We seem to have forgotten that he is the final judge. Those that wish harm on others will pay the price one day. I also agree that if you have a child then I pray that he will not have a Girlfriend if he does you face the same as these people on here and will have to move and or be in shame the rest of your life. This can happen to any of us and we never know when. I agree also that yes it could be you, me or a close relative that gets the knock on the door one day. Why because of John Walsh's hate for men and that is a shame that he has that much hate in his body. As it relates to Lunsford well we all know he is a pervert and not a good example for any child. He proved that by not even taking care of poor Jessica. God help the United States.

Belle Johnson said...

While I've read some very disturbing news here. I can only say that it clearly shows that Walsh and Lunsford is out to exploit their poor children's death. While Patty Wetterling has no need to gain from her still missing son. While Walsh has closure and Lunsford. This lady has none! Nor does she have the support of a FOX NEWS to give so much money to support her. What a sick person Walsh is and from I see and read he should not as many have said be around CHILDREN! How do we know that he still does not have a sex addiction for women. Then we have Lunsford after seeing this my space page that is one sick man and needs to be locked away.

Shannon said...

Forget about these freaks Walsh and Lunsford we all know who they are what they're after "$$$$$$$" However what was shocking. Was the part about the corruption and cops that have been caught molesting children. Florida is going to hell and to think I live here.

Ray L. said...

If I was not a God Fearing man I would love to get in the ring with either one of these freaks and challenge them to a fight of their life. I would even pay to do it if I lost then I would donate to not them are their fake foundations. I would donate to a child and family that have been hurt by these tow fools. By the way I must say this that whoever did this blog it exposes Lunsford for who he really is and that I will agree. To reply to the question would I let my children around an admitted woman Sex Addict the reply is NO NO NO!!!

Rachel D. said...

So if the DA and police found Child Porn on Lunsford computer why is he not in jail??? I have seen many others even children ages 8 9 and 10 years old. Also why is that McDade in Georgia that copied and distributed tapes of the Wilson boy that is in jail now for consensual sex? Why is McDade not in jail its a law so why is the laws only good for the people that are not well known.

Sebrenna said...

Like one person said on here why don't people put at least their first name on here? There is no reason not to. However that person put CBS so what is she hiding.

Jeffery said...

I have one question about this site. Thatis why in Gods name would anyone that lost a poor child like Mark did put that stuff on his my space. Please someone tell me that I am seeing things with that Gun in his hand? Our kids are having enough hard times today to be exposed to that as well. TV has already caused many problems for children.

anne said...

What about the studies that show that most all sex abuse occurs by someone the child knows, and or a friend, mother or father, uncle etc. From what I've read it 96% + happen in this manner. So why are we not asking our children to tell all and give them a survey in schools about good touch and bad touch? I am sure we will find out many people will be caught. Maybe this is a way to really get the bad people and then our children will be homeless. But hey it's worth it if they have been abused by a person other than John Walsh would have one believe hiding in the bushes. Which is not the facts at all as I have read.

Shranda Ellis said...

In looking around all blogs to get an idea about Human Rights in the USA. I was shocked as well when I read this site. I am appalled that Mark Lunsford gets off with Child Porn found on his computer. When I see so many children being punished for consensual sex at ages that are normal for kids. My god can you think what would have happen to all of us if back when? Umm I need to read more about all of this stuff. I read the CNN report about John Walsh on here and to be honest I must admit that I again was shocked. However in this crazy world who knows. I guess the most disturbing fact that I found on here was about all of the Politicians, COPS!!! that have been caught molesting children? What is up with that? Where is our John Walsh when people need him most about the cops. Does anyone know if it's true about Mark Foley I saw the abc IM'S why is he not in jail? So many ?? here that are very interesting.

Howard said...

I would also why if he change his profile to private, and why he took down the Gun Picture? Maybe he doe shave much to hide. I am not for him in any manner because of what I have seen. This man seems like a guy that can't be trusted period. Something is not right here as one person said. I have gone to some of the my space pages and they are there. Some have even been cancelled that was on Marks friend list.

Letsgetreal said...

http://news.bbc.co.uk:80/1/hi/scotland/7045544.stm

Adults are often too scared to work with young people for fear of being branded a pedophile, according to a new report.
A survey by Scotland's Commissioner for Children and Young People revealed that the fear of being accused of harming young people was the main deterrent.

Kathleen Marshall's study found a shortage of adults prepared to take work roles and volunteering posts.

More than 1,100 people took part in the detailed survey.

Some 48% of adults surveyed said fear of being falsely accused of causing harm was a barrier to contact with children and young people.

This same fear also made adults much less likely to help when they saw a young person in danger or distress.



The report also revealed that adults who work with young people in structured environments tend to have positive attitudes towards them, and enjoy seeing children and young people develop through their involvement. However, people reported much more negative attitudes to meeting young people in informal groups, especially in large groups on the street.

According to the report, fear was largely fuelled by media reporting rather than people's personal knowledge of young people.

Other concerns included fear of young people themselves, and concerns about bureaucracy and the culture of litigation.

Women are almost twice as likely to have formal contact with children and young people, either as a volunteer or through work, the survey showed.

'Social behavior's

Men in particular reported being afraid of being falsely accused of being a pedophile which they described as "the worst thing imaginable".

Men are also disproportionately less likely to approach a lost child and try to help.

Ms Marshall said: "Young people consistently tell us they want safe and fun things to do and that anti-social behavior is a result of a shortage of opportunities for 'social behavior's.

"The activities they want to take part in need adults to volunteer and support them and this report shows exactly why that isn't happening.

"We need to help bridge the divide between the generations and establish a framework for attractive activities that are stimulating, safe and fun for all involved.

"I hope this report will start a full public debate about how that should be done, and everyone who has ever worked with young people or considered doing so has something to contribute to that debate, as do Scotland's young people themselves."

Potential volunteers

George Thomson, chief executive of Volunteer Development Scotland, said that potential volunteers needed greater support.

He added: "We must now have the conviction and courage to overcome the challenges and find ways to take up the offer of voluntary help from adults in a way that benefits everyone."

John Loughton, chair of Scottish Youth Parliament, said that both adults and young people should feel safe, without "wrapping either of them in cotton wool".

A Scottish Government spokesman said: "We understand that some people are put off by checks - that's why we are simplifying it to cut down on multiple checks."

He said a new system would be in place in 2009.

Sharon P said...

We can tell you that we are shocked to see this story about John Walsh saying as he has done on CNN. Then when we looked it up on Google if this blog was real and factual. We must say that in no way could one ever support his campaign. Now this is also true of Mark Lunsford as we have looked that up as well. Why did his son only get 10 days and no register? This is corruption period. Thanks for the blog.

Alice F. said...

How can this man John Walsh sleep at night with what he has said.I have looked at the CNN and others that he has appeared on. I have found it to be true as well about what he has said. I agree that he even in one CNN stated that Mark Foley was involved and that he meaning John Walsh worked very close with him. He did make the statement on this blog and it just goes to show that he has lied to so many. Wow what a creep!!! and Sick-o he and that Lunsford guy. I will never allow my children to even watch Fox or Him again.

Satan said...

This would have so much more impact if the person who created it could spell and learn proper grammer.

Maybe it's just me, but I lose so much of the message as I'm trying to read and correct plain English.

The worst thing this person did was yell, "I'M NOT AN RSO", of course, that's not exactly what he said but it was the message. The first thing people think when they see that is, "yeah right".

I completely agree, of course, with the message.

The Fallen One said...

Iam glad you are back online! I didn't know this place even existed until someone posted this blogspot was shut down. The truth about John Walsh, Mark Foley, and Mark Lunsford must not be allowed to disappear! Fortunately I had copied this onto pdf just in case it disappeared.

This pretty much sums up Kohn Walsh so far:

1. Walsh encourages vigilantism (anus chips, bragging the FBI killed two guys threatening him)
2. Walsh is a sex addict (CNN Interview July 2003)- If sex addicts can't be cured, where does that leave Johnny boy?
3. John is a liar- there is not a single report to verify his claim that 1.8 million kids are missing in America! The NISMART-2 report found only 110 "stereotypical kidnappings" occured, and of those, only 44 were killed or permanently missing. The vast majority of missing reports were, in reality, runaway/throwaway children.
4. John Walsh's cohorts, Foley and Lunsford, have rather nefarious pasts. Also, if not for their connections to Walsh, they'd be sharing a cell, regardless of whether they are guilty or innocent.

Something is definitely amiss with Walsh. Vigilantes are as dangerous, if not moreso, than sex offenders. Maybe he should be the first candidate for his rectum chip idea, and if he gets too close to a sex offender, explode it.

The Fallen One said...

PS: Congrats on bringing back your blog. You are a true American hero, exposing the lies and corruption of the Walsh Empire.

The Fallen One said...

http://www.tampabays10.com/news/local/article.aspx?storyid=74523

Lunsford is now suing the Sheriff, guess he needs money for a new motorcycle

Amy Hill said...

Sounds like upstate New York has a lot of sex addiction for women. So now it's the Governor from NY and then it was John Walsh from new york with sex addiction. Then it was John Walsh in Florida saying the cops blew his case, now Lunsford says the cops blew his case. Is this a copy cat or the truth. Or is it a way for these guys to make money off their poor children's death?

Câmera Digital said...

Hello. This post is likeable, and your blog is very interesting, congratulations :-). I will add in my blogroll =). If possible gives a last there on my blog, it is about the Câmera Digital, I hope you enjoy. The address is http://camera-fotografica-digital.blogspot.com. A hug.

Anna R. said...

yes you're correct I have read all of this blog and the writting is on the wall. Walsh was married and screwing other woman. So was his wife screwing another man. So what doe sthis make these people? They should not be aroung children and this business of I made a mistake is so full of crap. Eg: Spitzer, Craig, Vitter, Clinton, how do all these people get by with well I made a mistake.

Harry said...

All I can say is wow what a liar this Walsh is. Worst than him is Lunsford.

Andraian T. said...

OMG I would never even allow my child to be around this man. I have read ll of this up to include Reve his wife having an affair. Then people think we should TRUST THEM? Just like the New York Governor now a him and his wife having affairs. Something is wrong with this type of people. They are sick and as John says they can't be cured. So why are we giving millions of dollars to this sick man???

Anonymous said...

Ouch John you and Mark Foley should be in jail period.

Maricar O. said...

We had no idea that John Walsh was addicted to women. I would agree after reading the link about sex addiction. Is he really cured????

I would not take a chance now after reading this!

Areathe G. said...

To think Larry King would have this liar on his show. After reading this and seeing the information myself on Google, because I never know if a blog is just out to get some one or its for real. Well I can tell you that this blog has all the facts about this sex woman chaser on here. Moreover Walsh admits it and we allow our children around him?? Are we mad or what and then all the politicians on the hill are right in there with him. Why because "BIRDS OF A FEATHER FLOCK TOGETHER".

Anonymous said...

I must be missing something here. John Walsh is NOT a pedaphile. Like millions of American's, he has an addiction to sex. It's no different that having an addiction to alcolhol or drugs. It's very serious, but it can be treated.

You are making John Walsh out to be a bad person for something he might not be able to control. At least not without help.

Jonie S. said...

Some on here have said that John Walsh is not a pedophile. while I might agree as far as we know? However there is a big difference in a sex offender and a pedophile. If you have read that site on here that I have linked, even CHILDREN ARE GETTING LOCKED UP FOR PLAYING AND DID SOMETHING WRONG. Does that make them a non pedophile as some have suggested on here? Or does that make them a sex offender? Does a teen mooning someone to make then a pedophile? The entire system is a mess. Then we have MARK FOLEY trying to get sex from a young man, I guess many of you will defend him as well. All I can say is the SMELLER IS THE FELLER or JUST LOOK AT THE WOMNEN TODAY MOLESTING CHILDREN. This Walsh Law is for his revenge and Mark Foley was right in the MIX!!!!!

Anonymous said...

This story is ignorant. Most sex addicts are not child molestors, and rarely are they sex offenders. You have gone to great lengths to gather information, it's a shame you didn't bother to educate yourself on the crux of the argument.
I would suggest you visit www.sexhelp.com for a sound definition of sex addiction.

Anonymous said...

John Walsh has gotten the media to claim Toole was a pedophile instead of a serial killer. What a scumbag! After yesterday's media release I wonder what this scumbag is trying to hock now!